[c-nsp] ASR920 MPLS P Functionality

[Hari Sapkota]

No issues as of now since I am using RSVP TE with explicit-path. And, the
signaling seems ok all the times.

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 5:30 AM, Patrick Cole <z at amused.net> wrote:

> I've not experienced any issues using them as P, but that is in a pure
> cisco environment.  Interop can always be a pain.
>
> PC
>
> Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:38:34PM +0000, Ian Goodall wrote:
>
>
> > After further investigation and debug it looks like we have hit bug
> > CSCuy29638 in a Juniper environment.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:01 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 23/Jan/18 18:49, Ian Goodall wrote:
> > >
> > > Can anyone confirm if the ASR920 platform can be used in a MPLS P role?
> > > They are working fine for us as small PE but we are having some very
> odd
> > > RSVP issues in the lab with transit LSP.
> > >
> > >
> > > What are these odd issues?
> > >
> > > Mark.
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
> --
> Patrick Cole <patrickc at spirit.com.au>
> Senior Network Specialist
> Spirit Telecom Ltd
> 19-25 Raglan St, South Melbourne VIC 3205
> Ph:  0410 626 630
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>