[c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance

Tim Stevenson (tstevens) tstevens at cisco.com
Wed Mar 20 13:33:08 EDT 2019


-----Original Message-----
From: Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 10:23 AM
To: Tim Stevenson (tstevens) <tstevens at cisco.com>
Cc: Nick Cutting <ncutting at edgetg.com>; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance

Thanks Tim,

Here is the output of show hardware rate-limiter.  ( i believe it's 40k)


>> Yes looks to be the same as on 9300-EX/FX/FX2.


This is my first time dealing with SFLOW, Can you share some
configuration parameter i should use for best practice would be great,
What is 1-in-N sample actually?


>> Sampling rate is controlled via config:
tstevens-93180yc-ex-4(config)# sflow sampling-rate ?
  <4096-1000000000>  SFlow Sampling rate

>> You need to calculate the PPS of the traffic on the source interfaces to determine the sampling rate that will keep the max number of samples to under 40K from all sources.


I am planning to use mgmt0 interface for SFLOW and its 1G so i assume
it will handle all the flow. do you seeing any concern there?


>> With max of 40Kpps of sampling, it should be fine on 1G mgmt0.
>> Tim


# show hardware rate-limiter

Units for Config: packets per second
Allowed, Dropped & Total: aggregated since last clear counters


Module: 1
  R-L Class           Config           Allowed         Dropped            Total
 +------------------+--------+---------------+---------------+-----------------+
  L3 glean                 100               0               0                 0
  L3 mcast loc-grp        3000               0               0                 0
  access-list-log          100               0               0                 0
  bfd                    10000               0               0                 0
  exception                 50               0               0                 0
  fex                     3000               0               0                 0
  span                      50               0               0                 0
  dpss                    6400               0               0                 0
  sflow                  40000     25134089890               0       25134089890

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:07 PM Tim Stevenson (tstevens)
<tstevens at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, this is 1st gen. The SFLOW/SPAN restriction should not apply there.
>
> Re: 60Gbps/24Mpps and SFLOW, SFLOW does not do aggregation of stats for flows in the switch like netflow does - it's just 1-in-n packet sampling. As such, the value of "n" should be high enough that both the switch & the collector are not overburdened. Note that we will rate limit SFLOW copies to the CPU so that's the first 'bottleneck'. If you end up tail-dropping samples, the statistical validity of your sampled set goes out the window, so you want to ensure that 1-in-n is a number that does not hit that rate limiter.
>
> I don't have a 1st gen switch handy to see what the defaults are for that value. It should show up in 'sh hardware rate-limiter'. In 9300-EX with 9.2.2 it's 40Kpps.
>
> Beyond that, you also want to make sure the collector is able to consume everything coming from all sflow enabled switches without dropping, for the same reason mentioned above.
>
> Hope that helps,
> Tim
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 8:40 AM
> To: Nick Cutting <ncutting at edgetg.com>
> Cc: Tim Stevenson (tstevens) <tstevens at cisco.com>; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance
>
> We have cisco Nexus9000 C9396PX
>
> 60 Gbs is data traffic, and 24Mpps ( packet per second ) not sure how
> to convert it into flows. Could you please share your sflow
> configuration if you don't mind?
>
> I had nfsen in past with 8CPU / 4GB memory but it was damn slow :(
> but it could be me.. i will set up again and see if it worth it or
> not.
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:34 AM Nick Cutting <ncutting at edgetg.com> wrote:
> >
> > Good point.  We waited for the second Gen
> >
> > Regarding 60 Gbs, isn’t that is the data traffic, not the flows or sampled flows levels?
> >
> > Our NFSEn box is centos
> >
> > 4 vCPU and 4 GBrams
> >
> > Collecting flows from maybe only 30 devices, about 20Gbs and 3k flows per sec.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Stevenson (tstevens) <tstevens at cisco.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 11:20 AM
> > To: Nick Cutting <ncutting at edgetg.com>; Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com>; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance
> >
> > This message originated from outside your organization.
> >
> > Make sure you distinguish between N9300 (1st generation) and N9300-EX/FX/FX2 (2nd generation). The SFLOW + SPAN limitation applies only to the latter. It's also on the latter that Netflow is supported, which can run concurrently with SPAN sessions.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Nick Cutting
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 6:19 AM
> > To: Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com>; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance
> >
> > We use sflow on 9300's, no performance hit - but you cannot use span sessions at the same time.
> >
> > Newer code revisions support netflow, without the SPAN session limitation, although we have not tried netflow on the 9300 yet.
> >
> > For a collector We use NFSEN - opensource, and quite a big install base, and it seems to handle a lot of flows.
> >
> > It supports sflow and netflow as we have a mix, just make sure you add the sflow option at build time as it’s a bit funky old linux to add it after.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Satish Patel
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 8:21 AM
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [c-nsp] Nexus 9300 sflow performance
> >
> > This message originates from outside of your organisation.
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > I have L3 Nexus 9300 switch which is running 60Gbps traffic on ISP interface so I’m planning to run sflow on that specific interference to get flow.
> >
> > Does it going to create any performances issue on switch?
> >
> > Can I run sflow on Layer 3 LACP interface?
> >
> > Can anyone suggest free open source sflow collector?
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list