[c-nsp] Experience with 9500-16X ?

[Gehring Kai]

We run two 9500-16X (as a virtual stack) with 16.9.2 as a router and concentrator at a smaller site. No problems so far, just runs.
I'd agree with Steve about the ASIC Generations (UADP 2.0/3.0) though, better buy something with the 3.0 today.

Kai

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik at civeo.com> 
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 4:22 PM
To: Michael Malitsky <malitsky at netabn.com>; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: Experience with 9500-16X ?

We run the 16x and 40X. I honestly wouldn't buy them again since the other 9500 models use the UADP 3.0 ASIC and have better buffers. The UADP 2.0 9500 switches  split the 32MB buffer into two 16MB buffers per core, well the UADP 3.0 9500 switches have 36M shared between both cores. I have heard that pricing between the 2.0 and 3.0 9500s is pretty close. I don't know why Cisco has ASICs that work different in the same switch series, just makes it hard to know what switch you are really getting.

https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-9500-series-switches/white-paper-c11-741484.pdf



From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Michael Malitsky
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 9:54 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Experience with 9500-16X ?

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Civeo.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Does anyone have personal experience with the Catalyst 9500 series (specifically interested in 16X)? Impressions, caveats?


Sincerely,
Michael Malitsky

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp>
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/<http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/>