[c-nsp] RSVP-TE was (no subject)

[Mark Tinka]

On 17/Apr/20 11:26, adamv0025 at netconsultings.com wrote:

> Is this applicable to RSVP-TE though? 
> In other words, will ISIS/OSPF BFD-triggered session down event on a
> particular interface (if the interface stays up) trigger RSVP into switching
> over the affected LSPs to a bypass LSP protecting the affected link/node?
> Or does RSVP need to become a client of BFD (same way as ISIS/OSPF is)?
> I honestly don't remember, currently all core links are "ae" bundles, so
> relying on lfm/micro-bfd to modify interface state -which does trigger RSVP
> into action.

RSVP can be BFD-aware as well, yes, but it normally works off of the
IGP. So as long as the IGP adjusts itself based on event (aided by BFD),
RSVP will just keep tracking that.

Mark.