[c-nsp] RPKI extended-community RFC8097

[Antonio Prado]

On 4/18/20 1:00 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>> If not, can you elaborate on the reasons?
> 
> I read this question as you think carrying the information in iBGP is
> the norm, I view it as an exception. I'm not sure why you'd want to do
> that, so I'm curious to hear what is your use-case for needing it.

No, I don't know if it is the norm or not, that's why I'm asking.
I talked to some guys not willing to use those extended-communities for
$reason.

I just wanted to have a broader and diverse opinion on that.
--
antonio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20200418/a0bed439/attachment-0001.sig>