[c-nsp] ARP requests

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Wed Aug 19 12:29:53 EDT 2020


On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 06:23:36PM +0200, ??ukasz Bromirski wrote:
> Working with TAC would be probably best option going forward.

I find your optimism amazing.

(My TAC case about "ASR920 do not always honour IPv4 ACLs on SVIs"
is not getting anywhere since December.  We managed to reproduce the
issue in the TAC lab around April...)

It might give some sort of satisfaction if a TAC case eventually comes
to a conclusion different from "works as designed" or "the effect is
gone after reboot" or "have you tried upgrading to the latest version?"
(and then "gone after reboot") but for ongoing operational problems,
we have been less than underwhelmed with TAC performance.


"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you 
 feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted 
 it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
                             Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20200819/081172c8/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list