[c-nsp] Cisco N540-ACC-SYS ipv4 routes
Phil Bedard
philxor at gmail.com
Mon Jul 13 15:51:31 EDT 2020
The initial iteration of the PTX couldn't. It was really just meant as an LSR with relatively low FIB scale, couldn't do Netflow (remember the external server to do it?), etc. That quickly pivoted to something more capable. Juniper sort of positioned the initial version as a route reflector since that was one of the other things it could do due to selective FIB install.
Thanks,
Phil
On 7/13/20, 2:36 PM, "cisco-nsp on behalf of Mark Tinka" <cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of mark.tinka at seacom.com> wrote:
On 13/Jul/20 19:19, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
> PTX was created as platform that will do only MPLS-based forwarding,
> with tiny IP routing table scale.
> The idea was marketed as something that will get Juniper leading edge across SPs and win back accounts.
Except it can do millions of routes in RIB and FIB, so...
Mark.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list