[c-nsp] Rehosting a perpetual CSR1000V license

Saku Ytti saku at ytti.fi
Fri Jul 24 09:56:26 EDT 2020


On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 16:52, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:

> yep, that works fine for electricity because the cost of generating
> electricity is a significant percentage of the amount that the end user
> pays.  I.e. the marginal cost is significant, so it's worth billing per
> kWh.  If this model had been a better way of charging for residential ip
> data delivery, it would have been deployed a long time ago, but the
> marginal cost per bit isn't worth it in the majority of cases because
> the cost of mass billing is so high.

I've had few upgrades since LS1010+VXR network and there is a
statistically relevant correlation to more bandwidth demand related to
the upgrade cycles. If you remove the heavy users, you can skip entire
cycles, putting your CAPEX in 50%, 33%, 25% of less of what it is.
Also your wave and transit costs decrease rapidly over time, as they
become cheaper faster than your user traffic increase, if you
cherry-pick the lowest 70% users.
Consumption is a significant cost driver.

-- 
  ++ytti


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list