[c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why?

[Phil Bedard]

On 6/17/20, 6:31 PM, "cisco-nsp on behalf of Mark Tinka" <cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:


    On 17/Jun/20 23:07, adamv0025 at netconsultings.com wrote:

    > First of all the "SR = network programmability" is BS, SR = MPLS, any
    > programmability we've had for MPLS since ever works the same way for SR. 

    I see it the same way.

[pmb]   There are things I can do with SR and a stack of globally significant labels I can't do with LDP or RSVP-TE.  I don't know if I'm going to call them programmability though, that's  a loaded marketing term.  

Phil