[c-nsp] Mass-renaming interfaces

[Eugene Grosbein]

28.09.2020 20:00, Aaron wrote:

> Unfortunately no.

Funny thing, I had very old sub-interface created just for testing:

interface GigabitEthernet0/1.2239
 encapsulation dot1Q 2239
 xconnect X.X.X.X 239 encapsulation l2tpv3 manual pw-class MyPeer
  l2tp id 239 239
  l2tp cookie local 4 239
  l2tp cookie remote 4 239
  l2tp hello l2tp-defaults
!

But for interface Port-channel1.2239 it did not accept "xconnect" part of configuration,
so if I would still need it, I'd move this to another router without Port-channels before investigation.