[c-nsp] FIB scale on ASR9001

[Lukas Tribus]

On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 16:12, Mark Tinka <mark at tinka.africa> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/14/21 08:58, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> > I don't think IETF is making standards for specific implementation.
> > The implementation agnostic solution is to keep all routes which we
> > rejected due to consulting validation database, regardless of
> > validation state.
>
> Agreed, and covered in the draft:

You better clarify:

- when this is implemented, STOP triggering route-refreshes from RTR
updates (otherwise there is no point to it in the first place)
- implement the above without BREAKING existing route-refresh
functionality for non-RTR related code paths (like other RPL changes)


Lukas