[c-nsp] Support for CFP2

[Nick Hilliard]

Shawn L via cisco-nsp wrote on 19/01/2024 14:35:
> At $dayjob we're working on turning up a 100G connection with a provider.
> At this point, it looks like the only optic that's meets their criteria is
> a CFP2.

sounds like metro 100G connectivity. What sort of distances are 
involved, and is there a requirement for DWDM? If it's shorter distance 
and no DWDM, 100G LR4 extended reach might work (8dB power budget, 
compared to the usual 4dB for standard LR4).

Nick