[c-nsp] Best Practices for quickly removing routes when BGP peer drops

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 09:15:52AM +0200, Saku Ytti via cisco-nsp wrote:
> However some reasons people might not want to do BGP free core is that
> they don't know how to get traceroute working without inflated
> latencies, which might cause customer tickets. There is an easy
> solution to it, but it may not be obvious.

Can you share some reading material on this?

(We've been on the "receiving end" on this a few times, like traceroutes
showing "munich -> frankfurt" latency jumps of +100ms due to LSPs going
trans-atlantic being involved - and understanding better options might
be useful in convincing transit ISPs to do better ;-) )

gert
-- 
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you 
 feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted 
 it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
                             Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20251211/9d23ee26/attachment.sig>