[c-nsp] BGP ORR - experiences
Mark Tinka
mark at tinka.africa
Tue Oct 21 00:02:40 EDT 2025
On 20/10/2025 22:50, Phil Bedard wrote:
> A bit late but we (Cisco) do have some folks running ORR but not many.
> Recently I worked with a large provider and in the end they decided
> to just distribute RRs across their network instead. I’m not aware of
> any limitations with the ASR9K specifically in regards to ORR, there
> is no silicon dependence with ORR in IOS-XR. It’s what we would call
> a platform-independent function.
>
> However, we typically recommend folks look at the RR appliance or
> XRv9K/xRD for RR use cases since the general CPUs are much more
> powerful than the ones we put into a router RP.
In my day, the only ASR9000 we had was the ASR9001 client.
Try as we might, it couldn't be part of our BGP Add-Paths
infrastructure. Not enough control plane resources to hold more than one
full table in 2023.
While I imagine the Intel-based ASR9000 routers are much more powerful
as a client, I agree that running a route reflector on compute is the
best way forward.
Mark.
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list