<html><body>
<p>Tim,<br>
<br>
I am using these in a few different ways:<br>
1:As one link of VSS 6509e sets (other is Cx4 cable)<br>
2:As connections within the data center (Copper SFP+ to nearby 3750e switches)<br>
3: Optical to some HP blade enclosures (with SFP+SR Modules)<br>
<br>
Everything else I use X2 modules (optical and CX4 copper).<br>
<br>
I can tell you that at least one SFP+ (LRM, I think) takes a fairly new version of code to operate. Also make sure you have at least V2 of everything (one-x, SFP+ copper cable, etc). Last summer I ordered a number of these for a build and ran into links that were either intermittent, or just would never come up. Cisco ended up sending me a 1 for 1 replacement of every piece and did not want the old ones back. A few make for good decorations in the cube, but the rest had a date with the trashcan.<br>
<br>
Jeff <br>
<br>
__________________________<br>
Jeff Orr, CCNA<br>
Network Engineer, Information Technology<br>
Genesis Healthcare Systems<br>
jorr@genesishcs.org<br>
DID: 740-454-4572<br>
<br>
*For any IT problem, request, or question please contact the IT service desk at x4330, 740.454.4330, or ITservicedesk@genesishcs.org<br>
<br>
<img width="16" height="16" src="cid:1__=0ABBF2ABDFDFCB218f9e8a93d@genesishcs.org" border="0" alt="Inactive hide details for Tim Durack ---02/14/2011 04:05:24 PM---According to: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modul"><font color="#424282">Tim Durack ---02/14/2011 04:05:24 PM---According to: <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/m">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/m</a></font><br>
<br>
<font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">From: </font><font size="2">Tim Durack <tdurack@gmail.com></font><br>
<font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">To: </font><font size="2">cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net</font><br>
<font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Date: </font><font size="2">02/14/2011 04:05 PM</font><br>
<font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Subject: </font><font size="2">[c-nsp] 6500 CVR-X2-SFP10G</font><br>
<font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Sent by: </font><font size="2">cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net</font><br>
<hr width="100%" size="2" align="left" noshade style="color:#8091A5; "><br>
<br>
<br>
<tt>According to:<br>
</tt><tt><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/OL_6974.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/OL_6974.html</a></tt><tt><br>
<br>
<</tt><tt><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/OL_6974.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/OL_6974.html</a></tt><tt>>CVR-X2-SFP10G<br>
is<br>
supported on the 6500. Anyone using these in production? I only see<br>
reference to CU and SR SFP+ transceivers. Is that true?<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Tim:><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<br>
</tt><tt><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp</a></tt><tt><br>
archive at </tt><tt><a href="http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/">http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/</a></tt><tt><br>
</tt><br>
<DIV>
***Confidentiality Notice***<BR>
<BR>
The information contained in this e-mail message (Re: [c-nsp] 6500 CVR-X2-SFP10G) sent from (JOrr@genesishcs.org ), including any attachments, are intended only for use of the individual or entity named above (tdurack@gmail.com, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net). This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of the communication or its substance is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to this e-mail indicating you are not the intended recipient and immediately destroy all copies of this e-mail. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of any privileged information.<BR>
Message Sent: 2011-02-15 08:59:36<BR>
</DIV></body></html>