<html><body>
<p><font size="2">You could also renumber your stack by using</font><b><font size="2"> "switch current-stack-member-number renumber new-stack-member-number" </font></b><font size="2">global configuration command</font><br>
<font size="2"><br>
__________________________<br>
Jeff Orr, CCNA<br>
Network Engineer, Information Technology<br>
Genesis Healthcare Systems</font><br>
<br>
<img width="16" height="16" src="cid:1__=0ABBF2FBDFCE1E1F8f9e8a93d@genesishcs.org" border="0" alt="Inactive hide details for Drew Weaver ---04/04/2011 12:54:31 PM---Hello, I am looking for a top of rack switch for a little pro"><font size="2" color="#424282">Drew Weaver ---04/04/2011 12:54:31 PM---Hello, I am looking for a top of rack switch for a little project and the 3750 has caught my eye.. I</font><br>
<br>
<font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">From: </font><font size="2">Drew Weaver <drew.weaver@thenap.com></font><br>
<font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">To: </font><font size="2">cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net></font><br>
<font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Date: </font><font size="2">04/04/2011 12:54 PM</font><br>
<font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Subject: </font><font size="2">[c-nsp] Questions Regarding Cisco 3750 switches</font><br>
<font size="2" color="#5F5F5F">Sent by: </font><font size="2">cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net</font><br>
<hr width="100%" size="2" align="left" noshade style="color:#8091A5; "><br>
<br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">Hello,<br>
<br>
I am looking for a top of rack switch for a little project and the 3750 has caught my eye.. I had a few odd questions about it however.<br>
<br>
First, can you enable auto-negotiate on the 10/100/1000 ports that will only allow the host to negotiate 10/100 unless you want them to negotiate 10/100/1000?<br>
<br>
I believe there is a command in some 10/100/1000 switches that limits the maximum negotiation speed to 100Mbps or 10Mbps without having to set the speed/duplex manually.<br>
<br>
Second, is there any way with a switch like this to alter the port number?<br>
<br>
instead of GigabitEthernet0/1 it would be GigabitEthernet1/1? I know this seems trivial but some custom written software for whatever reason starts counting at 1/1 and goes to 1/48 (probably because it was made for 6500s)<br>
<br>
thanks,<br>
-Drew<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<br>
</font></tt><tt><font size="2"><a href="https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp">https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp</a></font></tt><tt><font size="2"><br>
archive at </font></tt><tt><font size="2"><a href="http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/">http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/</a></font></tt><tt><font size="2"><br>
</font></tt><br>
<DIV>
***Confidentiality Notice***<BR>
<BR>
The information contained in this e-mail message (Re: [c-nsp] Questions Regarding Cisco 3750 switches) sent from (JOrr@genesishcs.org ), including any attachments, are intended only for use of the individual or entity named above (drew.weaver@thenap.com, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net). This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, any disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of the communication or its substance is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to this e-mail indicating you are not the intended recipient and immediately destroy all copies of this e-mail. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of any privileged information.<BR>
Message Sent: 2011-04-04 13:03:12<BR>
</DIV></body></html>