Return-Path: Delivered-To: niccolo.belli@linuxsystems.it X-policyd-weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -7.6 X-Unknown-Client: Junk Received: from puck.nether.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) by mail.linuxsystems.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1923014F30 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 15:16:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]) by puck.nether.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4AD9CAn023146; Thu, 10 May 2012 09:13:09 -0400 Received: from owa.swan.sk (owa.swan.sk [217.75.72.124]) by puck.nether.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4ACu93f017270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 08:56:10 -0400 Received: from vitkovskynb (10.1.41.209) by SH01.swan.local (10.1.44.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Thu, 10 May 2012 14:59:50 +0200 From: adam vitkovsky To: Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 14:59:50 +0200 Message-ID: <00a901cd2eac$c8dc3620$5a94a260$@swan.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac0urMUxdvluMYB+SoiD1F22H4MBsQ== Content-Language: sk X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (puck.nether.net [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 10 May 2012 09:13:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]); Thu, 10 May 2012 08:56:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-Topics: Subject: [c-nsp] best for IPTV: pure L3 multicast, Draft Rosen MVPN or MLDP based MVPN? X-BeenThere: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "list for people using cisco in a NSP \(Network service provider\) environment" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net Sender: cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.linuxsystems.it X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at mail.linuxsystems.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Hi, I'd like to ask what are your operational experiences with Cisco's MLDP based MVPNs -is it worth implementing or do you know of any hidden drawbacks? Or should we better stick with the L3 m-cast + the MoFRR for resiliency I'm asking because I'd love to have all services under the mpls umbrella though not for all costs thx adam _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/