[c-ubr] uBR-7223 Question

[Friedrich Lobenstock]

Hi!

*This time with the correct attachments*

René-Roger Ziesack wrote on 26/03/08 18:50 MET:
> 
> the depends on some parameters - which bandwidth do you plan per user?
> What kind of services do you plan to provide (internet only, voice 
> services)?
> How does you network look like (SNR, ingress)?
> 
> In general; what you described is more a minimal configuration without 
> any redundancy.

Attached two load and one traffic graphs of almost the same UBR with
currently 406 installed modems.

Setup:
    uBR7223 with:
    1x NPE-225 (128M RAM)
    1x I/O-FE
    1x PA-FE-TX
    1x uBR-MC16S (uBR-MC16C with Spectrum Analyzer)

To be realistic with 4000 installed modems you probably need at least 50
from your upstream ISP.

One uBR-MC16C can realistically do 20MBit (30Mbit theoretically) in the
downstream - tested it myself.

At least a uBR7246 VXR with NPE-400 and 2x uBR-MC28C would be what I would
choose for in your case.

But I'm not really qualified as I haven't gone there myself yet.

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: headend-cpuload-day.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3608 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-ubr/attachments/20080326/aeb2881c/attachment-0003.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: headend-cpuload-week.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5535 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-ubr/attachments/20080326/aeb2881c/attachment-0004.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: headend-feth0-0-week.png
Type: image/png
Size: 18438 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-ubr/attachments/20080326/aeb2881c/attachment-0005.png