[cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...

Jeff Behl jeff at expertcity.com
Wed Jul 16 16:39:12 EDT 2003


thanks.  looks like tricky dialplan or wait unil MGCP comes out for the 
7200s, which rumor has it is slated for Dec...

jeff

Wes Sisk wrote:

> Nope.
> 
> To be able to route specific calls to different ports you will
> either need to get a bit creative with your dialplan.
> 
> Currently you probably have dial-peers with something like 9.T
> going out both ports.  Change this so 7.T goes out one port and 9.T goes
> out the other port.  Then use the Route Pattern/Route List/Route Group
> in /CCMAdmin to strip/prepend the appropriate trunk access code.
> 
> /Wes
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jeff Behl [mailto:jeff at expertcity.com]
>>Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 4:40 PM
>>To: Wes Sisk
>>Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
>>
>>
>>thanks.  one q remaining:  once I do this will i have the ability to 
>>add individual ports on the adaptor (there are two) to different route 
>>groups?
>>
>>
>>thanks again.
>>jeff
>>
>>Wes Sisk wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Sounds like you have your route pattern directly at the gateway
>>>so the gateway is not eligible to be in a routegroup.
>>>To get around it consider something like this:
>>>
>>>change your route patter to point at a route list
>>>(this frees the gateway to be added to a route group)
>>>
>>>Then configure your gateway to be in the route groups you desire.
>>>
>>>/Wes
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>>>[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Jeff Behl
>>>>Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:25 PM
>>>>To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>Subject: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>i have a 7200 with the above which is currently registered to the cm. 
>>>>what i'd like to do is put each pri port into its own route group then 
>>>>create a route list of the two groups.  is this possible in this 
>>>>situation?  right now putting the gateway by itself into a route group 
>>>>isn't possible as it doesn't show up as a possible addtion when 
>>
>>creating 
>>
>>>>one, though I've heard that it won't show up if the gateway is already 
>>>>defined for use in a dial pattern...
>>>>
>>>>thanks
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>




More information about the cisco-voip mailing list