[cisco-voip] Re: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 14, Issue 3

[Peter Mauro]

How does "marking these routes as Urgent routes" effect the handling of 
the call within CallMgr?

-- 

*************************************************

Peter J. Mauro                Peterj at ufl.edu <mailto:Peterj at ufl.edu>

Network Engineer, CCNP-VA   Phone: (352) 392-2061

OIT-Network Services        IPhone:(352) 273-1052

University of Florida       Gainesville, Fl 32611

*************************************************


>Message: 2
>Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 16:15:21 -0500
>From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 911
>To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>Message-ID: <009201c418f7$9f442ad0$25196883 at delliscious>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Cisco recommends using a more specific pattern for 9.911 and 911 calls and marking these routes as Urgent routes. This will prevent any overlapping dial plan from interfering with emergency calls. By using more specific patterns you can treat them differently, i.e. different external calling masks, different route lists (perhaps some copper after PRIs), etc. From what I understandy, CER (Cisco Emergency Responder) will want to use these seperate route patterns as well.
>
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040403/a0f0e366/attachment.html