[cisco-voip] making the move from 7D to 10D dialing
Ryan Ratliff
rratliff at cisco.com
Mon Dec 20 19:45:28 EST 2004
This is correct. You will want to specify the local-area-code. Also
make sure the dial-peers on the vg200 can route the call properly since
it's h.323.
I'd start by configuring the dial-peer on the gateway and make sure you
can make a call using the "csim start" command. Once that works
insert the route pattern into CM and make the call from an IP phone.
-Ryan
On Dec 20, 2004, at 4:05 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> Our local exchange is going to mandatory 10D dialing in the next year
> or so, but I wanted to make sure we were ready to go way ahead of
> that, especially since I was redoing our dialplan anyways. Here's how
> we did it.
>
> 9.@ w/filter that says local-area-code does not exist (this allows
> immediate routing of all 9.7digit calls.
>
> 9.@ w/filter that says local area code = 519
>
> if you simply create a filter that says local area code does exist,
> then i'm pretty sure you will introduce interdigit delay when someone
> tries to dial 7 digits.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Chad Whitten
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 2:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] making the move from 7D to 10D dialing
>
> my 7D route pattern is 9.@ and im not doing any prefix'ing or
> discard'ing of
> digits. I have more specific route patterns setup for local exchanges
> served
> by other gateways, (9.544XXXX for instance) but the 9.@ is the "default
> route" for any outgoing calls that dont match one of the more specific
> rules.
>
> On Monday 20 December 2004 13:16, you wrote:
> > In your 7D Route Pattern you probably have 9.[2-9]XXXXXX. You can
> work
> > with the Called Party Transformation like this. 9.[2-9]XXXXXX
> "Called
> > Party Transformation" Discard digits PreDot, "Prefix Digits (Outgoing
> > Calls)" 9abc (where abc=local area code)
> >
> > When a user dials a 95551212 the route pattern will present
> 9abc5551212
> > to the Voice Gateway.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chad Whitten [mailto:cwhitten at nexband.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 12:19 PM
> > To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [cisco-voip] making the move from 7D to 10D dialing
> >
> > our local RBOC will be forcing the use of 10D dialing for all local
> > calls starting in March 05. Right now they are allowing permissive
> > dialing of 10D (you can dial 7 digits or 10 digits). When I try to
> dial
> > 10 digits for a local number from our callmanager, i get a fast busy
> > after the 7th digit.
> >
> > i have a pri from the local rboc, terminated in a cisco vg200 using
> h323
> > to my callmanager. my route pattern on the callmanager uses a
> > route-filter called 7D dialing that has the "Local-Area-Code" set to
> > "Does-Not-Exist"
> >
> > my dial-peer on the vg200 is
> > dial-peer voice 1 pots
> > destination-pattern 9T
> > progress_ind alert enable 8
> > direct-inward-dial
> > port 1/0:23
> >
> > Im guessing I just need to create a new route-filter where the
> > "Local-Area-Code" does "Exist"
> >
> > Does anyone have any tips on making this transition as smooth as
> > possible?
> >
> > --
> > Chad Whitten
> > Network Administrator
> > neXband Communications
> > cwhitten at nexband.com
> > 601-944-4801 Phone
> > 601-944-4803 Fax
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> --
> Chad Whitten
> Network Administrator
> neXband Communications
> cwhitten at nexband.com
> 601-944-4801 Phone
> 601-944-4803 Fax
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list