[cisco-voip] T1 dropoffs.

[Wes Sisk]

Hi Peter,

Matching is done based on calling party number and called party number,
these are good places to start:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk90/technologies_tech_note09186a00801
0ae1c.shtml
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk90/technologies_tech_note09186a00801
47524.shtml
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk90/technologies_tech_note09186a00801
0fed1.shtml

/Wes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of
> peter.casanave at us.army.mil
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 8:54 AM
> To: EKNUDSON at houston.rr.com
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] T1 dropoffs.
>
>
> Eric,
>
>    We figured out the problem. It was a software problem in the
> tactical circuit switch. We have patched it and since have it up
> and good. By IDSN I meant the default switch type i.e. 5ess which
> we are using. We are using ds0-groups on a T1 emulating a 5ess.
> For our pri circuits we emmulate a dms-100.
>    Here is one thing I had a couple of questions about. If you
> are not running MGCP in your voice network and your gateway
> router accesses the T1s by dial-peer instruction, are their any
> commands required for the gateway to access PBX. I my situation I
> have a c3745 with 4 T1s. We have two in use right now and may add
> the other two soon. The two T1s are going to the same PBX. I know
> MGCP would probably make this work easier but, we are not using
> this at this time. My current dial-peers are identical for both
> T1s. The following is an example of how my dial-peers look now:
>
> dial-peer voice 1 pots
>  destination-pattern .......
>  port 3/0:0
>  foward-digits all
>
> dial-peer voice 2 pots
>  destination-pattern .......
>  port 3/1:0
>  foward-digits all
>
> The problem is that we do not have high call volume at this time
> but, here soon these circuits will be saturated. Will this method
> work. Is this the best way? And will this load balance at all? I
> know this may be elementary but, we, my Platoon of Soldiers, are
> learning this on the fly out of books. We have no formal
> training. Kevin Knowlen and I who are both members of this
> mailing-list have extensive router experience but not much with
> voice. Thank you all for your time.
>
> V/R,
> PETER CASANAVE
> SSG, USA
> BBN Platoon Sergeant
>
>