[cisco-voip] css, partitions and extension mobility

[Leonardo D'Urso]

Hi Wes, hi all

oh no Leonardo again! ;-)

I have read the chapter in online manual (chapter 7 page 8,9), and I have
read chapter 9 of Paul Girard: Troubleshooting ecc... I think my
configuration respect the closest match concept.

I have the same configuration on another customer of mine, with a
difference, lines(DN) are defined statically on phones and no user device
profile is in use. In this case all works fine.

This is an example of configuration in which I describe all of components:

the phone can call everyone. So it has a css in which there is a partition
in which I have the rp 0.! that points to the voice gateway for this
location.

the user device profile, in which I have the line, has a css in which I
have a partition in which I have a rp that blocks all calls to the
international. This route pattern is 0.00!

when I call:

0001-555-5555555 (where the first zero is used to catch the line)

the ccs of the user device profile defined into DN should match the block,
and then go to the bogus voice gateway.

But what happens is that the call is routed to voice gateway, and so this
approach seems that don't works.

Any idea?


thanks in advance.
Leonardo




On Sat, 22 May 2004, Wes Sisk wrote:

> Leonard,
>
> It sounds like you are attemting use "An Alternative Approach to Configuring
> Calling Search Spaces" found in the Callmanager 3.3 SRND
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/largeent/it/ese/srnd.html
>
> In order the for the blocking/permitting patterns to work as described, your
> 'permit' patterns must be a closer match than your 'deny' patterns.  The
> "closest match" logic is best described in Chapter 9 of Paul Giralt's book
> "Troubleshooting Cisco IP Telephony".
>
> Currently Dialed Number Analyzer actually uses its own match logic instead
> of using that of the currently active ccm.exe process.  This can lead to
> incorrect results in very specific corner cases, such as yours.  95% of the
> time, DNA should provide accurate results.
>
> /Wes
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Leonardo D'Urso
> > Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 6:45 PM
> > To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [cisco-voip] css, partitions and extension mobility
> >
> >
> >
> > hi there,
> >
> > I have done this configuration:
> >
> > my phones has a css in which I have a route pattern that authorize all for
> > the phone.
> >
> > I have user device profile in which I have configured a css with
> > partitions that don't permit for example international calls.
> >
> > When I try to verify with Dialed number analyzer all works fine, the
> > international call, that is NOT authorized match the rule and ends on
> > bogus gateway.
> >
> > But when I do this making phone call the call is routed.
> >
> > Is this an Extension mobility limit? I have this configuration without
> > extension mobility and all works fine.
> >
> > thanks in advance,
> > Leonardo
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>