[cisco-voip] RE:4.1.2 to 3
Brad Waldbauer
Brad at isccorp.net
Thu Apr 7 12:17:13 EDT 2005
I just did a new install to 4.1.2 and then to .3 and it went fine. I
just hit the exe and away it went. I'm just starting to program my
pieces and I haven't had any problems.... yet. LOL.
Brad
ISC - Information Systems Consulting
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 06:35 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 26, Issue 33
Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. 4.1.2 to 3 (Voll, Scott)
2. can not upgrade lic on cue (james)
3. Re: AS5400-HPX platform restriction (Jon Lewis)
4. install ccm 4.12 erroe ( ??? )
5. IPCC Express 3.1 calls stuck in queue problem
(Gawie Herholdt (GSP))
6. : Question about Java programming (Aurelien FACHAUX)
7. RE: 7. (the BIG mystery) Callmanager Express and ATAfax
Passthrough (Boda Gy?rgy)
8. Phone stuck in Forward.. (Tamer Mohamed Bayomy)
9. Berbee InformaCast (Eric McKinney)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:51:12 -0700
From: "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll at wesd.org>
Subject: [cisco-voip] 4.1.2 to 3
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <D713462ED535184D830F6F6301753E7E01511C20 at VISHNU.wesd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Anyone upgrade from 4.1.2 to 4.1.3 yet? The PDF attached is really
designed for 4.0 and 3.3 to 4.1 so I'm looking for a better doc. Do I
just need to install it like a SR?
Thanks for any input.
Scott
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:21:33 -0400
From: "james" <jgrace at digitelusa.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] can not upgrade lic on cue
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <000201c53afc$8e6a2de0$320d020a at digitelcorp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I having a problem with upgrading the lic pkg on my cue nm . i was fine
with the software upgrade. and unity is working at this time. but cue
will not take the lic pkg file. the ftp transfer goes fine and
completes. i reload and nothing, it still have the same 12 mailboxs. im
trying to up grade to a 100mb pkg. i call tac in on it and ive had no
luck....
James Grace
System Engineer /Professional Srvc.
MCSE MCSA MCDBA CCNA CCNP CQS
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050406/96ffc1
38/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 23:12:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis at lewis.org>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] AS5400-HPX platform restriction
To: Ryan Fields <jryan.fields at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504062305030.12430 at web1.mmaero.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Ryan Fields wrote:
> We are currently running voip service using an AS5400-HPX
> and would like to have off-ramp faxing as well. I did a couple
> of tries of having both voice calls and off-ramp process at the
> same time. So far its working fine but to be on the safe side
> and not degrade its performance, I'd like to find its platform
> restrictions. How can I verify the maximum simultaneous
AFAIK, cisco does not publicly release such specs. I had a customer
trying to do fax broadcasting with a AS5400-HPX about year and a half
ago.
You might find something in the cisco-nas archive around Aug 2003...but
off the top of my head, I think we got up to somewhere around 150
simultaneous outgoing faxes, but that was with the box doing absolutely
nothing else (other than the occasional crash), dedicating all its CPU
to
faxing. I wouldn't expect it to do reasonable VOIP quality with
anywhere
near that number of faxes going on at the same time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:59:36 +0800 (CST)
From: " ??? " <jianghb at netease.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] install ccm 4.12 erroe
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <4254CC43.000019.10977 at m217.mail.netease.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
04/08/2005 14:13:02.326 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsPreinstall iuRunCommand:
szCmd_ = "C:\utils\shutdown.exe" /L /R /Y /T:0
04/08/2005 14:13:02.876 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsPreinstall CreateProcess:
Error: 3: The system cannot find the path specified.
04/08/2005 14:12:58.019 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsInitialize Did not find
file: "C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1.CCM\LOCALS~1\CCMServices.ctl"
04/08/2005 14:12:58.019 CCMSetup.cpp fnrsInitialize FindFirstFile:
Error: 2: The system cannot find the file specified.
WHO???
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:17:42 +0200
From: "Gawie Herholdt \(GSP\)" <herholgs at telkom.co.za>
Subject: [cisco-voip] IPCC Express 3.1 calls stuck in queue problem
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<4561B54D504B79499D37BB32C86A67FE01C75411 at CNTRRA20-XCS00.telkom.co.za>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi
I have a problem with a 3.1(2) IPCC Express system where 1 call is
stuck in the queue for more than 3 hours now. The system works fine -
all incoming calls are being queued / de-queued but just this one call
is stuck in the queue. Is there a way to clear this call without
restarting the engine? I have about 6 call center groups on there and
do not want to affect all of them.
Thanks
Gawie
Thanks and regards,
Gawie Herholdt
Snr Network Specialist, CCIE 7668 (R&S)
Telkom SA (Pty) Ltd
27-84-607-7371 (Mobile)
27-12-680-7991 (IP Phone)
27-12-680-0028 (Fax)
==================================================================
This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited
e-mail legal notice available at
http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050407/309e42
cb/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:19:48 +0200
From: "Aurelien FACHAUX" <aurelienfachaux at hotmail.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] : Question about Java programming
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <BAY106-F13A7D90921846C9D7934C2A23E0 at phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi everybody,
I have a real problem with the CISCOIPPHONESTATUS AXL tag... In fact, I
want
to know if it exists a way to use it with Java in order to implement an
interface with JTAPI...
I need to generate a call and to display caller informations on IP PHONE
screen.
If you have some sourcecode or advice, don't hesitate ton contact me.
Best regards.
Aur?lien.
_________________________________________________________________
Ne cherchez plus, trouvez ! Avec le nouveau MSN Search.
http://search.msn.fr/
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:41:51 +0200
From: Boda Gy?rgy <gyorgy.boda at nextiraone.hu>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] 7. (the BIG mystery) Callmanager Express and
ATAfax Passthrough
To: "Andre Beck" <cisco-voip at ibh.net>, <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<F3CFD039AAEB4244B1FE1F48B2821A16116B3D at aebserver01.alcatel-ebs.intra>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
ATA to GK registration:
configure via ATA's web page
GK= 21.3.3.3
GKID=<zone name>
AutMethod = 0x00000004
PWD0 = 1#
AudioMode=0x00150015 for fax pass thru
[even though you will see stars, just type 1# in this field]
UID0 = 3003 <DN>
LBR = 3 for G729
Regs,
Gy?rgy Boda
-----Original Message-----
From: Andre Beck [mailto:cisco-voip at ibh.net]
Sent: 2005. ?prilis 6. 18:16
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7. (the BIG mystery) Callmanager Express and
ATAfax Passthrough
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 06:43:09PM +0200, Lasse Christiansen wrote:
>
> I've really been confused as to Cisco's recommendations on the ATA.
> I've seen H.323 specified on CCO while a Cisco SE advised me to use
> SCCP.
There has been lengthy discussion on this list regarding the issues of
faxing vs. ATAs. I have no first hand experience yet (coming soon), but
AFAIK it should work with skinny as long as you tweak the ATA correctly.
You have to set at least one bit mask in the device so it forcibly talks
G.711u/a. I've tested this only briefly and against a CCM, but CCME is
on the agenda.
> Have anyone tried registering CME DN's with a GK ?
Yes, works out of the box. If subscribed to a GK CCME registers all its
EPhone-DNs at the GK. Together with a RAS dialpeer you can easily
distri-
bute DNs dynamically over a cloud of CCMEs and dial to every of them,
the
closesed thing to dynamic call routig I've found so far.
> and also registering ATA's with a GK ?
With Skinny they are just ephones so it works out of the box. I don't
know how they would register in H.323 mode, though - they should
register
themselves then, needing correct config for it, if that's at all
possible.
> I've created Service Provider setup's with ATA's running SIP. But in
> this scenario it looks like H.323 would be the right choice for the
CME
> solution.
Only if you absolutely don't get it running with Skinny. If there are
any known bugs which reliably prevent this and have no known and/or
acceptable workarounds, I'd like to know more about them as well.
Sales dropped in ATAs because they are cheaper than VWIC-*FXS and I've
got to deal with it :-/
HTH,
Andre.
--
The _S_anta _C_laus _O_peration
or "how to turn a complete illusion into a neverending money source"
-> Andre Beck +++ ABP-RIPE +++ IBH Prof. Dr. Horn GmbH, Dresden <-
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:02:34 +0200
From: "Tamer Mohamed Bayomy" <tamer.bayomy at xceedcc.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Phone stuck in Forward..
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
<72C99EF734F5AA449E45D132B979D1D901642875 at XCEEDMAIL.Masreya.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Dear All,
I have a weird problem with one of Cisco IP phone 7940 that is
registered in
CCM 4, the user using this IP phone once made forward to another Cisco
IP phone 7940 then he wanted to cancel this forward he is unsuccessful,
can anyone help with this problem as I even deleted the 2nd phone and
still the 1st phone still forwarding the calls can't stop this
forward?!!!
Any help?!!
Regards..
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:40:42 -0400
From: "Eric McKinney" <emckinney at fuquay-varina.org>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Berbee InformaCast
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <200504071234.j37CYnUc072188 at puck.nether.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
We are looking at putting in Berbee's InformaCast for paging, has anyone
used this? Looking to get any pro's or con's on it.
Thanks,
Eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050407/445605
56/attachment.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 26, Issue 33
******************************************
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list