[cisco-voip] Slight Off Topic: H323-to-H323 Video Gateway?

[Walenta, Phil]

Most firewalls these days do NAT h.323 properly, so you could in theory
NAT your VC unit inside so that outside devices could reach it if I'm
understanding your environment correctly.

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Spencer Wood
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 12:00 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Slight Off Topic: H323-to-H323 Video Gateway?



This message is a little bit off topic, so please feel free to here the
delete key. 

Anyway, does anyone know of a good H.323 to H.323 gateway for Video
Conferencing??  Our Video Conferencing units sit inside our firewall,
and we would really like to give these units to natively call H.323
Video Conferencing units on the Internet. 

Thoughts?
Spencer
************************************************************
Spencer Wood, Network Manager
Ohio Department Of Transportation
1320 Arthur E. Adams Drive
Columbus, Ohio 43221 

E-Mail: Spencer.Wood at dot.state.oh.us
<mailto:Spencer.Wood at dot.state.oh.us> 
Phone: 614.644.5422/Fax: 614.887.4021/Cell: 614.774.3123 
************************************************************* 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050425/4197bb29/attachment-0001.html