[cisco-voip]Unity Question

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

it's an easter egg!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Network Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"I had a coffee and Coke at lunch today...and now, I've got more jitter than an
IP phone on a long haul 10base2 connection"                                           LFJ
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mike Armstrong 
  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:06 AM
  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]Unity Question


  Fascinating.  We swapped disks from a failing server to a backup server and 
  ran for well over a week, as I recall, with no indication of any problems. 
  Eventually switched back when the original Unity server was repaired.

  Mike Armstrong
  UF/IFAS CREC
  Lake Alfred, FL

  Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
  From: Erick Bergquist <erickbe at yahoo.com>
  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]Unity Question  (ANSWER)
  To: erickbe at yahoo.com, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "Burton,
  Jason" <Jason.Burton at CoreBTS.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  Message-ID: <20050816122958.72225.qmail at web41127.mail.yahoo.com>
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

  I posted the original question on the unified
  messaging forum (link below) and got a reply that the
  grace period is 4 hours.

  http://forum.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=IP%20Communications%20and%20Video&topic=Unified%20Communications&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.1dd90e99
  > Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:48:19 -0500
  > From: "Burton, Jason" <Jason.Burton at CoreBTS.com>
  > Subject: [cisco-voip]Unity Question
  > To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
  > Message-ID:
  > <99EEDC5258650A43B7990A6CCA899665A14BAE at in001020.COREBTS.local>
  > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
  >
  > Recently the our Unity server had a hardware failure, long story short.
  > We had a machine sitting in the rack that we restored Unity onto, its
  > working fine.  Now the question is why is it running alright?  Isn't the
  > license file based on the MAC of the NIC?  We have request in to Cisco
  > for a new license file, but I'm curious as to why it is working now.
  >
  >
  >
  > Thanks!

  _______________________________________________
  cisco-voip mailing list
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050816/ed374d9d/attachment-0001.html