[cisco-voip] problem with part and css (the none partition)

Davis, Michael Michael_Davis at eLoyalty.com
Sun Dec 4 15:02:33 EST 2005


I don't have a whole lot of experience with 3.1, but I have recently been "burnt" by forgetting the CTI vs non-CTI search order. :-)

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Mark Snow [mailto:highspeedsnow at gmail.com] 
	Sent: Sun 12/4/2005 1:47 PM 
	To: Davis, Michael; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
	Cc: 
	Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] problem with part and css (the none partition)
	
	

	Good Point!
	
	For those of you out there running versions prior to 3.1 when it was still
	'Call Mangler'.
	
	Also if you are running those previous versions, try Forwarding your phone
	to it's own DN and then calling it from another phone - just for fun! ;)
	
	> -----Original Message-----
	> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-
	> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Davis, Michael
	> Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 1:36 PM
	> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] problem with part and css (the none partition)
	>
	> Also,
	> Prior to CCM 3.1, Device Level CSS were placed ahead of Line Level CSS.
	As of
	> 3.1, Line Level CSSes are placed ahead of Device Level, EXCEPT for CTI
	devices
	> (Softphone, CTI Ports, Route Points, etc,) which use the old method.
	>
	> Mike
	>
	>
	>       -----Original Message-----
	>       From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of Mark Snow
	>       Sent: Sun 12/4/2005 1:13 PM
	>       To: 'Lelio Fulgenzi'; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	>       Cc:
	>       Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] problem with part and css (the none
	partition)
	>
	>
	>
	>       Guys,
	>
	>
	>
	>       The <none> partition is actually a real partition, it is there by
	default and
	> is assigned to the very bottom of every CSS.
	>
	>
	>
	>       So if you had a RP of '91X' in the INTERAL_PT belonging to the
	> HQ_911_CSS and Phone 1 at HQ had this CSS assigned,  but you also had a RP
	of
	> '911' in in the <none> Partition (PT) and the user at Phone 1 at HQ dialed
	911, he
	> would actually be routed to the 911 RP in the <none> PT due to the fact
	that it
	> appears last in the HQ_911_CSS and is a longer match.
	>
	>
	>
	>       It is similar to the <null> MRG, which belongs at the very bottom of
	every
	> MRGL.
	>
	>
	>
	>       MTC and HTH some :-)
	>
	>
	>
	>       -Mark Snow
	>
	>       CCIE Voice # 14073
	>
	>
	>
	>
	>   _____
	>
	>
	>       From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-
	> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
	>       Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 12:19 PM
	>       To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	>       Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] problem with part and css (the none
	partition)
	>
	>
	>
	>       Oh yeah, and don't forget the <None> partition. It's not really a
	partition,
	> but it encompasses as DNs and patterns that have not been assigned to a
	> partition. There is no easy way to block access to these DNs unless you
	create
	> duplicate entries in another partition and block those (which we have
	done). I
	> can't remember the search algorithm and whether the <None> partition is
	simply
	> placed last in the ordered list and searched accordingly or if it is
	searched only
	> after no match is made in the other partitions. A search on CCO docs could
	tell
	> you this probably.
	>
	>
	>
	>       We've moved towards a dialplan model that has next to no DNs in the
	> <None> partition. The only ones we have in there are our campus emergency
	> number and our helpline number. In the event that a phone goes out
	> misconfigured, chances are very high they will be able to call these
	numbers.
	>
	>
	>
	>               ----- Original Message -----
	>
	>               From: Lelio Fulgenzi <mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>
	>
	>               To: James Grace <mailto:jgrace at digitelusa.net>  ; cisco-
	> voip at puck.nether.net
	>
	>               Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 1:13 PM
	>
	>               Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] problem with part and css
	>
	>
	>
	>               Think of it this way, a calling search space is simply an
	ordered
	> list of partitions which the line or device searches through for a match
	of the
	> dialed digits. If you look through the traces, you will see the term PSS
	which I
	> believe stands for Phone Search Space. This is made up of the line's
	ordered list of
	> partitions and then the device's ordered list of partitions. For example:
	>
	>
	>
	>               CSS1=PartA,PartB,PartC
	>
	>               CSS2=PartX,PartY,PartZ
	>
	>               Device assigned CSS1
	>
	>               Line assigned CSS2
	>
	>               the PSS would be: PartX,PartY,PartZ,PartA,PartB,PartC
	>
	>
	>
	>               So the idea you propose is a valid one. We use it here.
	Assign the
	> device access to everything and then deny the line access to particular
	services.
	> We isolate the 'everything' to PSTN access and actually allow oncampus
	access
	> through the line's partition.
	>
	>
	>
	>               You have to make sure that the denies are at least as
	specific as
	> the allows. And by denies, I mean, creating a route pattern that has the
	'block'
	> option checked.
	>
	>
	>
	>               Post back if you need more...
	>
	>
	>
	>
	>
	>
	>
	>                       ----- Original Message -----
	>
	>                       From: James Grace <mailto:jgrace at digitelusa.net>
	>
	>                       To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	>
	>                       Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 12:35 PM
	>
	>                       Subject: [cisco-voip] problem with part and css
	>
	>
	>
	>                       we have a cm 4.1.2 es 41
	>
	>                       i was just told by a tac rep that 4.1. and higher
	uses both
	> css on line and device.
	>
	>                       what does this mean????
	>
	>
	>
	>                       i have my device as unrestricted and all of the part
	in it.
	> and then i have my line configure with a customize css, ie maybe no int
	calls or LD
	> calls.
	>
	>                       the problem im having is that when i make a ld or
	int call,
	> uses the device.  and when i make a ipphone call ( 4 dgit dialing between
	sites) it
	> uses the line. I dont understand this.  nore do i understand  the
	statement   IT
	> USES BOTH LINE AND DEVICE.   can someone Please clear this up for me.
	> Thanks in advance
	>
	>
	>   _____
	>
	>
	>                       _______________________________________________
	>                       cisco-voip mailing list
	>                       cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	>                       https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
	>
	>
	>   _____
	>
	>
	>               _______________________________________________
	>               cisco-voip mailing list
	>               cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	>               https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
	>
	>
	> _______________________________________________
	> cisco-voip mailing list
	> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
	




More information about the cisco-voip mailing list