[cisco-voip] Unity 4

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

You can also use an internet subscriber to do this, which doesn't violate any licencing. (I would hope). And does not use up any licences.

-----                                                                -----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.                                  lelio at uoguelph.ca.eh
Network Analyst (CCS)
University of Guelph                             FAX:(519) 767-1060 JNHN
Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1                          TEL:(519) 824-4120 x56354
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     remove the 1st letter of the canadian alphabet from my email, eh!
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Andrew Dignan 
  To: medley at mac.com ; 'Tim Reimers' ; 'King, Jesse' 
  Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 9:54 AM
  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 4


  Pretty sure that violates a Cisco/Microsoft licensing agreement..could be 
  wrong but....

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "Tim Medley" <medley at mac.com>
  To: "'Tim Reimers'" <tim.reimers at asheville.k12.nc.us>; "'King, Jesse'" 
  <JKing at thegranitegroup.com>
  Cc: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
  Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 8:51 PM
  Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Unity 4


  > It is a real hard sell for Unified Messaging, most of the customer we have
  > using are really only using the part where the voicemail message shows up 
  > in
  > their email in box.
  >
  > One solution, is to just use exchange to email the voice message to a 
  > users
  > email address somewhere. We do this frequently. You lose MWI integration
  > between the outlook inbox and the voicemail box, but that's not a huge
  > issue.
  >
  > Simply setup an smtp connector in exchange and then set a forward
  > destination on the email account in AD.
  >
  > Best part is it's free!
  >
  > tm
  >
  >
  >
  > Tim Medley
  >
  > http://www.medleylabs.com
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
  > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Reimers
  > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 8:27 AM
  > To: King, Jesse
  > Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  > Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Unity 4
  >
  >
  > We do not have Unified Messaging installed either-
  >
  > We have discovered that it's reasonably stable to have users use the
  > OutLook Web access to get their voicemail-
  >
  > Most of our admin staff uses desktop Outlook, so then they can just open
  > up a browser session to
  >
  > http://unityserver/exchange/ and log in.
  >
  > Ours happens to be in a different AD domain, so their login looks like:
  >
  > \\UNITYDOMAIN\username.username
  >
  > Works great! no need to actually unify messaging-
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
  > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
  > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 11:07 AM
  > To: King, Jesse
  > Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  > Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Unity 4
  >
  > And just remember all the $$$ you spend just to make new voicemail
  > (email accounts). But I have been forced into this also.
  >
  > Scott
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
  > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
  > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 8:22 PM
  > To: King, Jesse
  > Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 4
  >
  > The only huge difference between UM and voicemail only is how users
  > check their voicemail.  Because of system load we don't support having
  > on-box Exchange with UM as it's just asking for trouble.  We also don't
  > support running Exchange 2003 on-box period.
  >
  > If you've got Exchange 2003 already deployed then the best thing for
  > you to do is to create a second AD account for folks who don't want or
  > need UM.  Have this be their voicemail mailbox but leave it on whatever
  > Exchange server you want.
  >
  > -Ryan
  > On Feb 10, 2005, at 10:33 PM, King, Jesse wrote:
  >
  > I am currently on Unity 3.x, looking to upgrade to 4.04? shortly -
  >
  > A few questions -
  >
  > Currently only doing voicemail only - If we choose to use the unified
  > benefits, is it possible to say User 1 only gets voicemail on the
  > phone, not in the inbox? User 2 gets both, etc? The reason being is
  > that some people would use this feature, but a majority of them just
  > don't need it.
  >
  >
  >
  > Currently Exchange 5.5 is installed on the Unity box and is in a voice
  > mail only mode - We have a separate exchange 2003 for email, is it
  > going to be a nightmare to transition over to unified messaging during
  > the 4.04 upgrade - I'm not even sure this is possible, need to do more
  > reading....
  >
  > Thanks..
  >
  > Jesse
  >
  >
  >  _______________________________________________
  > cisco-voip mailing list
  > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > cisco-voip mailing list
  > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > cisco-voip mailing list
  > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > cisco-voip mailing list
  > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > cisco-voip mailing list
  > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 

  _______________________________________________
  cisco-voip mailing list
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050212/73ea4909/attachment-0001.html