[cisco-voip] Question: Splitting T1 with PRI service (moot)

[Eric Knudson]

I suppose that could work, but I believe this is for outbound
connections only(internal win32 box -> cisco nas ->pstn), rather than
in.


On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:13:00 -0800, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll at wesd.org> wrote:
> So that works for calls coming in on my PRIs?
> 
> I have users that end up on the road and can't get broadband and need to
> get into inside resources so they dial in and I terminate on ATA then
> modems then on the network currently.
> 
> TIA
> 
> Scott
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Knudson [mailto:ericknudson at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 1:32 PM
> To: Voll, Scott
> Cc: Tony Kava; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Question: Splitting T1 with PRI service (moot)
> 
> What I suggest to my customers is to use com port redirection
> software, like dialout ez from tacticalsoftware.com - installs a
> virtual com port on a pc and provides a modem-pooling mechanism,
> instead of forcing use of a vg248/ATAs for legacy applications that
> still require modem use.
> 
> Eric
> 
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:03:38 -0800, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll at wesd.org>
> wrote:
> > I'm asking that Cisco comes up with a way CM can terminated a modem
> call
> > and place it on the network(choose which Vlan) with out modems and
> > ATA's.  Sure would help the old wiring closet.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tony Kava
> > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 9:57 AM
> > To: 'Eric Knudson'
> > Cc: 'cisco-voip at puck.nether.net'
> > Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Question: Splitting T1 with PRI service
> (moot)
> >
> > Eric:
> >
> > Well, that was my question.  The last resort would be to run this T1
> > through
> > an Adtran box to split it into two T1 connections for the Cisco (and
> use
> > a
> > VWIC for the voice).  I was hoping that I could avoid doing that.  As
> > I've
> > said before, I'm new to Cisco telephony so I'm learning as I go along
> > here.
> >
> > I think I said this previously, but my entire goal here was to make
> use
> > of a
> > full T1 because if I can't then 11 channels will be wasted.  I could
> > expand
> > our modems, but we really don't need more than twelve.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Tony Kava
> > Senior Network Administrator
> > Pottawattamie County, Iowa
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Eric Knudson [mailto:ericknudson at gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 10:55
> > > To: Tony Kava
> > > Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Question: Splitting T1 with PRI
> > > service (moot)
> > >
> > > Ah - so, data(modem) on the first 13, and voice(voip) on the last
> 11?
> > > If using an nm-ct1, no 'voice-port x/x:x' will be created, so,
> you'll
> > > need the vwic for that. Unless you're using an Access-Server, I
> don't
> > > see how you can service both voip and data(modem) calls on the same
> > > T1.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Eric
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:21:13 -0600, Tony Kava
> > > <ciscovoip at pottcounty.com> wrote:
> > > > Eric:
> > > >
> > > > I was probably not clear on that posting.  I meant that the
> > > T1 would be on
> > > > the NM-CT1, not the VWIC.  I'm probably going to have our
> > > phone company
> > > > setup a PRI group for the last 13 channels and standard
> > > DS0s for the first
> > > > 11 channels.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Tony Kava
> > > > Senior Network Administrator
> > > > Pottawattamie County, Iowa
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Eric Knudson [mailto:ericknudson at gmail.com]
> > > > > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 07:18
> > > > > To: Tony Kava
> > > > > Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > > > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Question: Splitting T1 with PRI
> > > > > service (moot)
> > > > >
> > > > > Tony,
> > > > >
> > > > > You''ll still run into the hardware limitation that a
> vwic-Xmft-t1
> > > > > will not allow you to configure 'isdn incoming-voice modem' on
> the
> > > > > sX/X:23 interface. On a 26XX/28XX/36XX/37XX platform you
> > > have to get
> > > > > the nm-ct1 to handle modem calls. You could alternatively use an
> > > > > AS5350(or any nextport platform) to handle both types of calls
> > > > > simultaneously, using DNIS to differentiate between modem
> > > and voice
> > > > > calls.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Eric
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>