[cisco-voip] Reverse translation pattern

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

If you're not willing to give up the extension on the top line of the phone, you will likely have to resort to creating new route patterns. :(

Can you not put the extension on the first line label? Obviously would take some work.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Network Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"I had a coffee and Coke at lunch today...and now, I've got more jitter than an
IP phone on a long haul 10base2 connection"                                           LFJ
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Voll, Scott 
  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 1:08 PM
  Subject: [cisco-voip] Reverse translation pattern


  I'm bringing on a site that will have a main number then extensions. 

  When dialing out I want the main number to show for all phones.  

  I'm doing toll bypass so I have about 150 prefix dial patterns and all
  of them are using the "use Calling Party's External Phone Number Mask"
  because the phones at other sites have DID's.  

  I really don't want to duplicate all the Route patterns.  

  Is there a way to say if extension = 12xx then make the phone mask
  5035551212?

  I would like the phone to have the extension so the end user knows there
  extension and I need space on the line label for names.

  Thanks

  Scott


  _______________________________________________
  cisco-voip mailing list
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20050722/68a1500a/attachment.html