[cisco-voip] 3rd Party Voice Mail Cluster using Hunt Groups and
CTI Route Points - Attendant Console
Wes Sisk
wsisk at cisco.com
Sun May 22 21:14:48 EDT 2005
So you need to load balance / round robin over CTI Route Points. If
you're already in the CTI business, how about a small application script
to round robin between them? This is very easy with Cisco CRS.
Though i'm not certain why Attendant Console Hunt Groups would not work
for this. It is valid (and works) to make an AC Pilot Point (which is
really just a CTI Route Point) A member of another AC Hunt Group.
You're certain the AC Huntgroup was functaional otherwise? It has be
associated to the AC user, TCD has to be running, etc.
/Wes
Paul Yago wrote:
>Wes, actually the VMs are interfacing directly to a CTI Route Point. A
>CTI Port is not being used by the VM.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk at cisco.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 1:08 PM
>To: Paul Yago
>Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 3rd Party Voice Mail Cluster using Hunt Groups
>and CTI Route Points - Attendant Console
>
>Paul,
>
>do your vm systems pickup calls directly from cti ports? or do they
>depend on redirects from CTI Route Point down to CTI port?
>
>/Wes
>
>Paul Yago wrote:
>
>
>
>>Wes,
>>
>>With AC, I believe I will encounter the same limitation when including
>>CTI Route Point extensions in the Hunt Group. I've tried this once
>>before but please correct me if I'm wrong. I'm trying this again.
>>
>>Thanks
>>- Paul
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk at cisco.com]
>>Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 12:46 PM
>>To: Paul Yago
>>Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 3rd Party Voice Mail Cluster using Hunt
>>
>>
>Groups
>
>
>>and CTI Route Points
>>
>>I don't have a cti app handy to test with, but you may be able to use
>>Attendant Console Pilot Point to frontend your cti ports.
>>
>>/Wes
>>
>>Paul Yago wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>We're trying to create a 3rd Party Voice Mail Cluster using Line
>>>Groups and CTI Route Points.
>>>
>>>I'm sure there are other people encountering this issue as well, and I
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>hope there is a work-around. Cisco claims that one doesn't yet exist
>>>and that a solution will exist in the future. Personally, I haven't
>>>found one yet.
>>>
>>>We wish to cluster up to 4 - 3^rd party Voice Mail Servers (VMs) to
>>>our 4.1 Call Manager in order to provide both redundancy and dynamic
>>>load balancing. The initial attempt at this was to create a Line
>>>Group, containing CTI Route Point extensions, along with a Hunt List
>>>and a Hunt Pilot. The Hunt pilot would be called and one of the
>>>members of the LG would be accessed based a distribution algorithm.
>>>This didn't work because the members of an LG can only be phone
>>>extensions, rather than CTI extensions.
>>>
>>>The next attempt was to use a phone extension and configure it to
>>>provided forwarding to the CTI extension. Again this failed because
>>>all forwarding is disabled for an extension that resides in an LG.
>>>Perhaps there is a way to enable forwarding of extensions when they
>>>reside in an LG; however I have not yet found it.
>>>
>>>Is anyone familiar with this situation and with a solution that can be
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>applied within the Call Manager itself?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Paul
>>>
>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>-
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>-
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>cisco-voip mailing list
>>>cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list