[cisco-voip] Any MeetingPlace Users?

[Voll, Scott]

I did a IPCC upgrade over the weekend that went horrible.  W/O TAC being
able to get on my servers via MP instead of it taking 22 hours it would
have been double.

I have not seen the video piece of MP but we do h323 video conferencing
in our state.  Weather you use MP or something else making a "Worldwide
Video conference solution" is going to be hard if you don't have end to
end QoS.

If we go outside our state network we have to use ISDN.  That is about
the only way you will get good video quality.  At a minimum of 384k.  

Scott


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Evans
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 8:54 AM
To: smgustafson at gmail.com
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Any MeetingPlace Users?

Steve - 

I am currently in the process of researching and procuring a worldwide
video conferencing solution for our company, and I second your request
to get some feedback from any MeetingPlace Users. Honestly, when I
talked to my vendor's Cisco rep a while back he basically told me not to
buy it b/c it wasn't ready. Hmmmm. From what I see, Polycom is the best
(only?) game in town and it seems to integrate seamlessly with Cisco,
but I'd like to at least give the homogenous Cisco architecture, a la
MP, a look. 

Scott's comment was good, but he hasn't seen video, and I'm not so sure
what he meant by:

"Personally we don't have it, BUT Thank GOD TAC has it.  I would have
been sunk without it this weekend."

Any input would be great!

Thanks!

Jason Evans 

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip