[cisco-voip] Device pools and Meet-me conference

Wes Sisk wsisk at cisco.com
Mon Nov 14 12:57:42 EST 2005


Messagemore specifically CM does not support NFAS via MGCP yet; does not
matter what kind of gateway you try to use.

/Wes
-----Original Message-----
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca]
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 12:49 PM
To: Voll, Scott; Fretz, EA Eric @ IS; Wes Sisk; IT
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Device pools and Meet-me conference


can the CMM PRIs do that 'sharing' of D channels?
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Voll, Scott
  To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; Fretz, EA Eric @ IS ; Wes Sisk ; IT
  Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 12:39 PM
  Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Device pools and Meet-me conference


  I’m running a CMM with 6 port PRI card and ACT card.



  Both run very well now.  The older IOS was pretty buggy but things seem to
be working well now.  I use the ACT card for both conferencing and
transcoding and works great.



  Scott




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
  Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 12:00 PM
  To: Fretz, EA Eric @ IS; 'Wes Sisk'; IT
  Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Device pools and Meet-me conference



  How's the stability of the CMM now? I remember when it first came out
there were some 'warnings' out there. We purchased the 6608 blades and are
quite happy with them. They might be better priced than the 6608 for
conferencing resources, but I remember when I costed them for analog ports,
compared to VG248, they were quite a bit more. Anyways, just my two cents.





    ----- Original Message -----

    From: Fretz, EA Eric @ IS

    To: 'Wes Sisk' ; IT

    Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net

    Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 9:32 AM

    Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Device pools and Meet-me conference



    For what it is worth, I am going through a VERY similar issue right now.
If you have a 6500 series chassis laying around, the CMM card with ACT
daughtercards will give you the best bang for the buck in transcoding
resources.  The 6608 is $25K and only yeilds 32 conference participants.
The CMM with 1 ACT (it can support up to four) costs $18K and will support
upto 128 conference participants.  Another drag on the 6608 cards is that
your switch must be running CatOS.  The CMM supports CatOS or IOS.



    --Eric

      -----Original Message-----
      From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wes Sisk
      Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 5:41 AM
      To: IT
      Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
      Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Device pools and Meet-me conference

      The default confernce resource that ships with CallManager is hosted
in the IP Voice Media Stream App process on the CallManager server.  This
resource only supports the g711 codec.  If you wish to host g729 members in
conference you must provide g729 conference resource or transcoders.  There
are IOS versions of both available for smaller scale deployments and modules
like the CMM and 6608 for large deployments.

      /Wes

      IT wrote:

      Some more information.

      It appears this is related to the Codecs for calling between regions.
When I set all the regions to use the same codecs to call between
themselves, multiple regions/devicepools could join the same conference.  Is
this a technical limitation of the meet-me conference? Will a bridge solve
the problem?

      Thanks,

      Avidan


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of IT
      Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 8:59 PM
      To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
      Subject: [cisco-voip] Device pools and Meet-me conference

      For some reason, phones in different device pools cannot join the same
meet-me conference. Whatever device pool the originator is in, becomes the
only device pool from which joining parties can join (but any outside
caller).

      Eg. Phone in device pool LosAngeles starts a meet-me, only phones in
LosAngeles pool can join, and SanFran pool phones get a busy...

      Has anyone else experienced this? Is there a workaround?

      Thanks,

      Avidan

      ******************************************************
      This email may contain trade secrets and/or other information that is
      proprietary and/or confidential. Use of this by anyone other than the
      intended recipient(s) is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are
not
      the intended recipient, delete the e-mail and notify us immediately.
      ******************************************************



--------------------------------------------------------------------------

 _______________________________________________cisco-voip mailing
listcisco-voip at puck.nether.nethttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco
-voip
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    cisco-voip mailing list
    cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
    https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20051114/c2b16978/attachment.html


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list