[cisco-voip] RE: Complicated Design Issue
Joe Toth
JToth at cmefcu.org
Tue Nov 15 11:18:51 EST 2005
Court,
The only way I have ever been able to move numbers between Central
Offices is to actually port the numbers to another CLEC. For instance I
have moved numbers between SBC and Time Warner Telecom into another CO.
It was a fairly easy proceed to accomplish and it saved us some money. I
have done this on both PRIs and regular POTS circuits.
If you don't want to go this route I would agree with Scott in trying to
find a SIP provider who could accommodate this request.
Joe Toth
Systems Engineer
CME Federal Credit Union
P: (614) 222-3350
F: (614) 222-3351
E: jtoth at cmefcu.org
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 11:09 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 33, Issue 74
Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. RE: New subscriber issue (Nick Kassel)
2. RE: Complicated Design Issue (Voll, Scott)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:52:58 -0000
From: "Nick Kassel" <Nick.Kassel at Charles-Stanley.co.uk>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] New subscriber issue
To: "Ryan Ratliff" <rratliff at cisco.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID:
<253FAE7A06B11B49A3A29770B2B8BAFC0C00C1 at CSEXCH01.charles-stanley.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Thanks Ryan, I'll try that.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 3:43 PM
To: Nick Kassel
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] New subscriber issue
Definitely try bouncing DBL on the publisher, that should fix it.
Then you need to put SR1 on there.
-Ryan
On Nov 15, 2005, at 10:40 AM, Nick Kassel wrote:
Hi Ryan
We are running 4.1(3) on 2000.2.7 SR8.
Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 3:36 PM
To: Nick Kassel
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] New subscriber issue
This is an indication of broken change notification. What version of
CM are you running?
You can try bouncing Database Layer Monitor on the publisher to see
if this fixes it.
-Ryan
On Nov 14, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Nick Kassel wrote:
I have an issue with a new subscriber we have added into our cluster,
all phones register with the new subscriber fine but when viewing
them on the ccm admin page on the publisher if I then reset the
phone it will not do anything and if I make a change then it will
not accept the change unless the phone is manually reset.
Anyone come across this before?
************************************************************************
***********************
The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential,
some or all
of which may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient
only.
Access to this e-mail by any other person is prohibited. If you are
not the
intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying, printing,
distribution of,
replying to or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
this
e-mail, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender
immediately
should this e-mail have been incorrectly addressed or transmitted.
You accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the
time the
recipient(s) accesses them and that delivery receipt does not constitute
acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s). You accept
that there
may be a delay in processing the instructions received from e-mails
after
Charles Stanley has received them. You are advised that urgent, time
sensitive
and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail.
You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of
malfunction, viruses, unauthorised interference, mis-delivery or delay.
************************************************************************
************************
Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304
Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Tozer Wingate are divisions of
Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member
of the
London Stock Exchange, International Securities Markets Association,
and The London International Financial Futures &
Options Exchange.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
McAfee
VirusScan and SurfControl Email Filter software.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
************************************************************************
***********************
The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential,
some or all
of which may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient
only.
Access to this e-mail by any other person is prohibited. If you are
not the
intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying, printing,
distribution of,
replying to or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
this
e-mail, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender
immediately
should this e-mail have been incorrectly addressed or transmitted.
You accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the
time the
recipient(s) accesses them and that delivery receipt does not constitute
acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s). You accept
that there
may be a delay in processing the instructions received from e-mails
after
Charles Stanley has received them. You are advised that urgent, time
sensitive
and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail.
You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of
malfunction, viruses, unauthorised interference, mis-delivery or delay.
************************************************************************
************************
Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304
Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Tozer Wingate are divisions of
Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member
of the
London Stock Exchange, International Securities Markets Association,
and The London International Financial Futures &
Options Exchange.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
McAfee
VirusScan and SurfControl Email Filter software.
************************************************************************
***********************
The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some
or all
of which may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient
only.
Access to this e-mail by any other person is prohibited. If you are not
the
intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution
of,
replying to or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
this
e-mail, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender
immediately
should this e-mail have been incorrectly addressed or transmitted.
You accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the
time the
recipient(s) accesses them and that delivery receipt does not constitute
acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s). You accept that
there
may be a delay in processing the instructions received from e-mails
after
Charles Stanley has received them. You are advised that urgent, time
sensitive
and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail.
You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of
malfunction, viruses, unauthorised interference, mis-delivery or delay.
************************************************************************
************************
Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304
Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Tozer Wingate are divisions of Charles
Stanley & Co. Ltd
Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of
the
London Stock Exchange, International Securities Markets Association, and
The London International Financial Futures &
Options Exchange.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
McAfee
VirusScan and SurfControl Email Filter software.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 08:09:10 -0800
From: "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll at wesd.org>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Complicated Design Issue
To: "Schuett, Court \(MBNAP it\)"
<Court.Schuett at us.millwardbrown.com>,
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <D713462ED535184D830F6F6301753E7E01A11A26 at VISHNU.wesd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Court-
As far as local numbers for the telecommuters: do they all live in a
single city? You could always get some pots lines or BRI with local
number to the town and put in a little 18xx router. Otherwise no. I
had this come up and telco will not move a number out of the CO. The CO
was only 20 miles away.
You might be able to look for a SIP provider that could get you a local
number?!?
I don't know how big of a conference is supported in IOS VGW but could
that do it for your 30 person conference.
If Conference Connection is like CM (note I don't use Conference
Connection) you have to do updates at the console. Lots of travel
between NY and Chicago.
Personally as far as VPN connections are concerned I would VPN them back
to where ever has the least response time.
With Unity and the WAN down, Can't you setup AAR for Voicemail?
All Comments are made without enough thought to be flamed if I am
completely out to lunch. ;-)
Scott
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Schuett, Court
(MBNAP it)
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 7:43 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Complicated Design Issue
We've got a pretty complicated design issue I was hoping to get some
help with. If anyone has any ideas, please let me know.
Some set up:
We have a main POP site in Chicago running a Call Manager Cluster and
Unity server. We have a remote site in New York that is connected to us
through two T1s in our Sprintlink IP VPN (it's not MPLS, but close. We
do get QoS, but not a full mesh). We have a VPN Concentrator at our
Chicago location and all internet bound traffic routes through there.
There is no direct internet connection in New York.
The New York office has requested a VoIP upgrade. There are
approximately 60 users in New York, and 40 in the field. By that, I
mean that they have 40 people who permanently telecommute from their
home. These people are scattered across the US and a few in Europe.
For these people, they want 7940s in their homes. We plan on connecting
these people with a VPN link through an 871 in their home.
We are planning on 2 PRIs for the New York office to handle their calls.
However, they would also like local numbers for their people. I didn't
think this was possible, but maybe someone has a better idea. They also
plan on having a 30 person conference once a week. The remote users
will be the people on this conference.
The design question that is troubling me is where to place everything.
We have an existing VPN concentrator in Chicago but we could possibly
use a router as a VPN concentrator in New York. As I said, we have an
existing Call Manager cluster in Chicago that we are planning on using
to handle calls. We are probably going to buy a Conference Connection
server as well. The question comes down to this: where should we have
the remote users VPN in to? Chicago, or New York? Where should we
place the Conference Connection server? We would like to place it in
Chicago so that more people can use it, but should it go in New York?
Is it possible to give local numbers to remote users? We are planning
on placing a Unity server in New York to handle voice mail for them, but
if the WAN link is down, is there a way for the New York users to
receive and check voice mail?
All help would be greatly appreciated. I was thrown this yesterday and
(of course) they need a solution in place by January 20.
Thanks!
Court Schuett
Millward Brown
Network Systems Engineer
630-955-8983
court.schuett at us.millwardbrown.com
====================================================
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual or organization to whom it is addressed. Any opinions or
advice presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the Millward Brown Group of Companies. If you are
not the intended recipient of this email, you should not copy, modify,
distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received
this email in error please notify the sender and delete this email
from your system. Although this email has been checked for viruses
and other defects, no responsibility can be accepted for any loss or
damage arising from its receipt or use.
====================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20051115/0c1020
3f/attachment.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 33, Issue 74
******************************************
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list