[cisco-voip] H323 vs MGCP

[Carter, Bill]

Usually more feature available with H323 (CallerID), but MGCP is managed
via CallManager.  Because CCM manages calls to the MGCP gateway, you get
better monitoring statistics (current # of Calls, channels in use,
etc.).
 
My rule of thumb is, use MGCP when you can, H323 when you have to.


________________________________

	From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Etts, Russell
	Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 11:21 AM
	To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
	Subject: [cisco-voip] H323 vs MGCP
	
	

	Hi everyone 

	I'm in the process of setting up a CCM (4.1) and 2801s.  What is
the advantage/ disadvantage between using a trunk between the CCM and
the 2801 (uses MGCP) and a regular H323 gateway?

	Thanks 
	
	Russ 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20051130/cd67ffd9/attachment.html