[cisco-voip] internal numbers ID masking

Kevin Thorngren kthorngr at cisco.com
Tue Apr 4 22:03:16 EDT 2006


Out of curiosity - why do you create a new Partition, CSS and 
Translation Pattern for each phone that wants to hide the Caller ID?

Kevin
On Apr 4, 2006, at 9:19 PM, Ed Leatherman wrote:

> If someone knows a better/cleaner way to do this, I would be ecstatic 
> to hear it. this is a big pain in the rear for us, so many professors 
> and doctors want their caller ID masked from everyone (and of course, 
> all masked as something different)
>
> On 4/4/06, Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com> wrote:This is 
> something I wish was easier to do with callmanager. Here is what we 
> do..
>>
>>  -Make a new partition, we call it MaskCLIDAs<number>
>>  -Make a new Calling search space, we call it Device_MaskAs<number>
>>  -Put the MaskCLIDAs<Number> partition as the first entry in the new 
>> CSS, and then put any additional partitions you would need to call 
>> (outbound partitions etc)
>>  -Make a Translation pattern that will match all your internal 
>> extensions, and use it to modify the calling party number to whatever 
>> you like. Make sure you set the new calling search space as something 
>> that can call your internal numbers. The new translation pattern 
>> should be in your new partition.
>>  -Configure the phone with the new CSS
>>
>>  basically you want interal callers to hit that new translation 
>> pattern when they call another internal number, so that it modifies 
>> the calling party number and then proceeds as normal with the call. 
>> Otherwise it places outside calls as normal.
>>
>>  Does that help? As you can imagine if you do this alot, you get alot 
>> of partition/CSS/translation pattern clutter on callmanager.
>>
>>  One thing to be careful of is to make sure your masked phones can 
>> still call everything they need to (call pickup groups tripped us up 
>> on this) with the new CSS. And also make sure they still cannot call 
>> things they shouldnt :)
>>
>> On 4/4/06, Grullon, David < David.Grullon at co.galveston.tx.us> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am trying to mask a number internally, extension to extension.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Ed Leatherman
>> IP Telephony Coordinator
>> West Virginia University
>> Telecommunications and Network Operations
>
>
> -- 
> Ed Leatherman
> IP Telephony Coordinator
> West Virginia University
> Telecommunications and Network 
> Operations_______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 3025 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060404/914aa27c/attachment-0001.bin 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list