[cisco-voip] Callmanager CFWDAll

Linsemier, Matthew MLinsemier at apcapital.com
Thu Apr 6 17:03:18 EDT 2006


Same here!  All of our CFWDAll database inconsistencies went away after
4.1(3)sr2.  You may want restart your CallManagers in your cluster, and
then run dblhelper to check your database.

 

Matt

 

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 4:44 PM
To: Ed Leatherman; cisco-voip at puck-nether.net Voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Callmanager CFWDAll

 

I guess knock on wood, we have not had any of these issues with
4.1.3sr2.

 

Scott

 

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ed Leatherman
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:35 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck-nether.net Voip
Subject: [cisco-voip] Callmanager CFWDAll

 

Anyone having problems with CFWDAll not working every now and then? I've
been having trouble with it ever since we upgraded to 4.0.. albeit they
are getting less frequent as I apply various SR's. We just had a burp
this morning with it and I had to reload DBL Mon this morning to fix
it.. was relatively painless but kinda annoying to still be having these
problems. So wondering if anyone else is having it happen. We're running
4.1(3)SR3a now.

-- 
Ed Leatherman
IP Telephony Coordinator
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT

This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be 
protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely
for the use of the addressee identified above. If you are not 
the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or 
distribution of this communication is UNAUTHORIZED. Neither this 
information block, the typed name of the sender, nor anything 
else in this message is intended to constitute an electronic 
signature unless a specific statement to the contrary is 
included in this message. If you have received this communication in 
error, please immediately contact me and delete this communication from
your computer. Thank you.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060406/7173d180/attachment.html 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list