[cisco-voip] vg224 vs vg248

[Ortiz, Carlos]

I had limited experience with the VG248 back in 2002.  Had some issues
with it back then but I would assume they have long been resolved.  We
currently have 2 VG224's in place and the best thing about them is that
they look and feel like the routers (IOS). Makes for easy configuration
(MGCP).  As far as I remember the VG248's were menu driven.  If you have
good experience with the 248's and need that type of density, I'm I
can't give you a compelling reason to change......

 

 

Carlos

 

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 11:45 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] vg224 vs vg248

 

Just wondering what people's opinions are on the two analog gateways
(vg248 vs vg224). I'm proposing a project that requires 128 ports
(perhaps more) and we only have experience (mostly good) with the vg248.
I'd rather keep our inventory similar so I'm leaning towards them rather
than starting a new with vg224s. 

 

Also, in the configuration guide, there is an option for IPSEC software.
Do I need this?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Network Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Sanity First : Number of days with fewer than
50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day:   buffer overrun

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060410/cb4dabac/attachment.html