[cisco-voip] [Q] Replacement for Cisco PA?!?

Netfortius netfortius at gmail.com
Wed Apr 12 11:01:04 EDT 2006


Thanks for replying - the way I was reading it was that the Unity Connection 
was a limited-capability systems (up to only 1500 users), English only, and 
not capable of unified messaging (a-la Exchange, Notes, etc.). In a staged 
deployment I would also need to integrate such with non-Cisco Call Processing 
solutions (Avaya and Nortel PBX), which also seem to be limited for 
the "Connection" version:

http://cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/products/ps556/c1650/cdccont_0900aecd80410ad6.pdf

Stefan

On Wednesday 12 April 2006 08:14, Kris Seraphine wrote:
> Unity Connection has most of the Personal Assistant functionality.  That's
> the way you'd probably want to go.
>
> On 4/12/06, Netfortius <netfortius at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is there a replacement for the Cisco PA? The Cisco Voice and IP
> > Communications
> > products and solutions page still refers to it in the Unity line item,
> > while
> > some folks in my group have heard that the PA is dead-ended, as far as
> > development ...
> >
> > TIA,
> > Stefan



More information about the cisco-voip mailing list