[cisco-voip] shared lines and primary lines, why not?

[Wes Sisk]

I believe this comment is a bit dated.  Back in the 3.x days when we  
had only 2 calls per line.  when 2 phones had the same shared line as  
their primary line the 2 users tended to lock each other off the  
phone (or strand a call on hold).  I cannot think of a reason not to  
do this in 4.x.

/Wes

On Apr 14, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:

Just wondering if any of the Cisco folk can comment on why this  
restriction (or caveat) is in place. I'm more interested than anything.

 From Cisco CallManager System Guide, Release 4.1(3): IP Phones

Do not configure shared line appearances on the primary lines of the  
phones; for example, if two phones have a shared line appearance,  
only one of the phones should have the primary line configured as  
shared (the other phone should have the secondary line configured as  
shared).
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.     Network Analyst (CCS)
University of Guelph     Guelph, Ontario     N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354     (519) 767-1060 FAX
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Sanity First : Number of days with less than
50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day:    buffer overrun
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060415/032184a1/attachment.html