[cisco-voip] vg224 vs vg248
Ed Leatherman
ealeatherman at gmail.com
Wed Apr 26 10:43:14 EDT 2006
Ok now that i've had a chance to pop one in the lab, here's what I found:
- EIGRP support has been recently added to the feature set for the VG224
IOS.
- As stated, you can bind int L0 to sccp
- You can use the MAC address for int f0/0 to configure the voice ports in
callmanager. f0/0 doesnt need to be up for the ports to work (although I
didnt try registering the ports with f0/0 down.. will try that next)
This all seems to work as I expected, depends on what your goal is with the
redundancy. I need to figure out if there is any tinkering I can do with
timers to make the routing switch over faster on a failure.
Our requirement was for redundant links, so that network ops can upgrade
software on their equipment and not cause an outtage, (as well as cover for
certain hardware failures) . If your power supply goes bad, this doesnt help
much :)
On 4/11/06, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
> Interesting, I just got a note back from my SE with what I'm sure was 'cut
> and pasted' advantages to the vg224 and it had redundancy in there. It
> will be interesting to see what you find out.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
--
Ed Leatherman
IP Telephony Coordinator
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060426/dac33884/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list