[cisco-voip] vg224 vs vg248

[Madziarczyk, Jonathan]

Ooooo, this is all good news for me.  Thanks for the update!

 

JonM

 

 

 

________________________________

From: Ed Leatherman [mailto:ealeatherman at gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 9:43 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: Madziarczyk, Jonathan; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vg224 vs vg248

 

Ok now that i've had a chance to pop one in the lab, here's what I
found:

- EIGRP support has been recently added to the feature set for the VG224
IOS.
- As stated, you can bind int L0 to sccp
- You can use the MAC address for int f0/0 to configure the voice ports
in callmanager. f0/0 doesnt need to be up for the ports to work
(although I didnt try registering the ports with f0/0 down.. will try
that next) 

This all seems to work as I expected, depends on what your goal is with
the redundancy. I need to figure out if there is any tinkering I can do
with timers to make the routing switch over faster on a failure.

 Our requirement was for redundant links, so that network ops can
upgrade software on their equipment and not cause an outtage, (as well
as cover for certain hardware failures) . If your power supply goes bad,
this doesnt help much :) 

On 4/11/06, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

Interesting, I just got a note back from my SE with what I'm sure was
'cut and pasted' advantages to the vg224 and it had redundancy in there.
It will be interesting to see what you find out.

 

----- Original Message ----- 



-- 
Ed Leatherman
IP Telephony Coordinator
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060426/ceea9925/attachment.html