[cisco-voip] Unity design question...

[Fred Nielsen]

Or Unity full version with "Integrated" Messaging.  
 
For "Integrated" (IMAP) configurations, the decision points between
Connection or regular really comes down to whether they need fault-tolerance
(failover) and how far they need the solution to scale in terms of
mailboxes/storage. 
 
There is no way to have a single Unity server addressing subscribers
distributed across multiple Exchange organizations/sites in a true "Unified"
configuration.
 
-- Fred Nielsen

  _____  

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Carter, Bill
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 6:34 AM
To: Jonathan Charles; cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity design question...


Unity Connection with "Integrated" Messaging.

  _____  

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:53 PM
To: cisco-voip
Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity design question...


Have a customer considering Cisco IPT.

They have nine different Exchange organizations that DO NOT trust each other
(making them trust each other is NOT an option).

Customer wants to know if there is a solution that does not include buying
nine Unity servers and using digital networking. They want unified
messaging, and they are unwilling to redesign their multiple
organizations... 

Is there a way to do this?




Jonathan

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061201/e24a9a14/attachment.html