[cisco-voip] Thoughts on 5.X CCM

[Voll, Scott]

In any of the implementations have they been using IPCCx or Unity.  If
so, what versions.

 

Scott

 

 

 

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Vince Loschiavo
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:27 PM
To: Wydra, Jason; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Thoughts on 5.X CCM

 

Yeah, I have a couple of 5.0(4) implementations.

 

The call control and functionality of the phones is rock solid.

 

The Admin Web page needs a little work....ran into a few bugs...but
nothing major.

 

I'm anxiously awaiting the 5.1 release...available on CCO next week.
Hopefully they fixed those admin page bugs!  :P

 

 

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Wydra, Jason
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 6:22 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Thoughts on 5.X CCM

I'm curious how much 5.X is being deployed. I haven't heard too much
buzz about it. Is it because it's unstable, scary, unappealing or what?
I'm trying to get an idea before I start recommending it or building it
in my lab. Any war stories? Most of the deployments I see today are
4.1.3 because it's a trusted/stable version. Is 5.X still too immature
even though it's been available for some time? 

 

Thanks,

 

Jason Wydra

Berbee

Cisco Voice Engineer

8725 West Higgins Road, Suite 700

Chicago, Il. 60631

IP phone 773.867.6084

Cell 630-209-9792

Jason.Wydra at berbee.com

www.berbee.com

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061205/5c73212e/attachment.html