[cisco-voip] Thoughts on CCM 4.2?

[Jonathan Charles]

Been running 4.2(3) in the lab, nothing heavy, not a single problem... going
to upgrade the servers at work if I get a chance...



Jonathan

On 12/13/06, Wydra, Jason <jason.wydra at berbee.com> wrote:
>
>  Hello all. I may have to move from 4.1(3) up to 4.2(1) or 4.2(3) in order
> to get support for MGCP T1 CAS hookflash on my 3845. As it stands hookflash
> on a T1 CAS only seems to be supported on a 6608 blade prior to 4.2.
>
>
>
> I would be curious to hear of any war stories from the field regarding
> stability, functionality, bugginess, etc….. I'm not sure if 4.2(1)sr1b is
> a better bet or if 4.2(3) is. 4.2(3) seems a little too new. Any advice
> would be appreciated. I haven't had any experience with 4.2 and I would
> hate to push my client into a messy platform.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Jason Wydra
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061213/1ef10003/attachment.html