[cisco-voip] Thoughts on CCM 4.2?

[Ortiz, Carlos]

Patrick,

Can you elaborate on your setup?  I am specifically interested in the
SIP provider setup and how that piece integrates to CCM and the PSTN.

Carlos

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Patrick Mowry
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 11:34 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Thoughts on CCM 4.2?

Jason,

Your email address is interesting since the only problem I have had with
4.2.3 is with multicast support with the phone loads supported on some
phones.
  Besides that everything is great.  I have one system using multiple
SIP providers for PSTN access.

-Patrick
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:50:16 -0600
From: "Wydra, Jason" < jason.wydra at berbee.com >
Subject: [cisco-voip] Thoughts on CCM 4.2?
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
	
<F6AE0EFE9F58A14BB09DB19A26E5C1ED39B553 at CTG-MSNEXC01.staff.berbee.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hello all. I may have to move from 4.1(3) up to 4.2(1) or 4.2(3) in
order to get support for MGCP T1 CAS hookflash on my 3845. As it stands
hookflash on a T1 CAS only seems to be supported on a 6608 blade prior
to 4.2. 

I would be curious to hear of any war stories from the field regarding
stability, functionality, bugginess, etc..... I'm not sure if 4.2(1)sr1b
is a better bet or if 4.2(3) is. 4.2(3) seems a little too new. Any
advice would be appreciated. I haven't had any experience with 4.2 and I
would hate to push my client into a messy platform.

 

Regards,

 

Jason Wydra

 


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip