[cisco-voip] priotize some voip phones over other phones
Jonathan Charles
jonvoip at gmail.com
Fri Dec 15 11:24:44 EST 2006
You mean preference, not precedence.
And that is just to order the dial peers, not to preempt calls.
Jonathan
On 12/15/06, kevin k <kds850 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> mlpp sounds great.
>
> i wonder if i can still push the idea of "precedence" on the dial-peer.
> although i wont be able to do "preemption" which sounds awesome.
>
> imagine
>
> dial-peer voice 1 pots
> answer-address <calling number>
> ip precedence <whatever is better>
> port 1/0/0
>
>
> then the <calling number> will have precedence over other calls attempting
> to grab the voice line at the same time.
>
> do you guys agree with the idea?
>
> plus, is there anyway to preemp the line????
> that will be quite cool.
>
>
>
> On 12/15/06, kevin k < kds850 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > here is the senario.
> > i have 100 voip phones inside an office.
> > let's out of 100, i want to ensure 5 phones to get calls to pstn no
> > matter what.
> > is there anyway to priotize the calls coming from them?
> >
> > so far, based on my reading it seems i can create "inbound dial-peer"
> > and give it better precedence. but it is for IP.
> >
> > will it work?
> >
> > or any other ideas?
> >
> >
> >
> > thanks.
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061215/406e0383/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list