[cisco-voip] How Can I resize the D partition or create a new one at CCM with OS 2000.4.3

Mon Dec 18 11:03:50 EST 2006

The D partition is a FAT partition. It needs to be configured as such
for recovery purposes and as you're all aware, FAT's size limitation is
2 GB. I haven't experimented with this yet, but you may run into issues
if you need to so a system recovery and the install cannot access the D
partition if you've replaced the D partition with a separate HD or
expanded the partition (and changing its format).

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 7:40 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 46, Issue 167

Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: How Can I resize the D partition or creat a new	one at
      CCM with OS 2000.4.3 (Ted Nugent)
   2. Re: Unity failover wizard (Ted Nugent)
   3. Re: How Can I resize the D partition or creat a new	one at
      CCM with OS 2000.4.3 (Ted Nugent)
   4. Re: Unity failover wizard (Ted Nugent)
   5. Re: H323 and MGCP simultaneously on gateway? (Craig M Staffin)
   6. Unity Voicmail Only with Failover (Message Store	Exchange
      2003?) (Jason Aarons (US))

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 14:30:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Nugent <tednugent69 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] How Can I resize the D partition or creat a
	new	one at CCM with OS 2000.4.3
To: Erick Bergquist <erickbe at yahoo.com>, new look
	<newlook110 at yahoo.com>,	cisco voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <20061217223002.73338.qmail at web36109.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

I probably wouldn't recommend resizing the drive on a
production server however you could just add another
SATA drive (any SATA should do since you can screw in
a drive on the 7815) to the server or get yourself a
USB drive as Erick mentioned.

--- Erick Bergquist <erickbe at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Ok... well, it is not suggested to keep your backup
> on a local drive. BARS gives a warning when you
> select the local drive. As for imaging, you can
> attach a USB drive briefly and image to that when
> you need to image the drive, etc.  Cisco only
> supports the BARS method for backup/restore. 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: new look <newlook110 at yahoo.com>
> To: Erick Bergquist <erickbe at yahoo.com>; cisco voip
> <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 10:05:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] How Can I resize the D
> partition or creat a new one at CCM with OS 2000.4.3
> 
> So I can Image the C: drive or to keep my Back on it
> and as you know that D drive is 2G only
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Erick Bergquist <erickbe at yahoo.com>
> To: new look <newlook110 at yahoo.com>; cisco voip
> <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 4:58:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] How Can I resize the D
> partition or creat a new one at CCM with OS 2000.4.3
> 
> 
> Why do you need to resize the D partition? 
> 
> --- new look <newlook110 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > Dear all,
> > Can I resize the D partition or creat a new one at
> > CCM with OS 2000.4.3?
> > Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com >
_______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 14:42:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Nugent <tednugent69 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity failover wizard
To: Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com>,
	"cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <731512.91421.qm at web36106.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Yes, I know exactly what you're going through! I spent
days working on this exact problem about a year ago
and it turned out to be an issue with browser service.
In our scenario the customer had the CM workgroup name
"voice" the same as the Unity domain which was causing
some serious browser election issues! Changing the CM
workgroup to "CM" resolved the problem for us. The
browser election is certainly your problem but fixing
it can be tricky. I can't remember the exact reg
setting but you prevent the servers from contributing
in the browser election on all your servers and force
just your DCs to be the only servers that can be
elected, they should be by default but I find thats
not always the case.

Also,
I hate to say it because I really do like Unity but
Unity FO is by far the worst product that Cisco has to
offer. I foresee many hours on the phone with TAC in
your near future. :-/

--- Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com> wrote:

> Anyone setup Unity failover on version 4.0(4)?
> 
> We are trying to configure failover, the second
> server is setup and ready
> but when we run the failover wizard we have to pick
> the failover server out
> of a list of servers in the domain but it doesnt
> appear in the list. It does
> show up in AD users & computers, can ping it, etc
> etc - but the wizard won't
> let me actually type the name of the server in, i
> have to pick it from the
> list where it doesnt appear. Anyone seen this or
> have any ideas why it
> doesnt show up?
> 
> -- 
> Ed Leatherman
> Senior Voice Engineer
> West Virginia University
> Telecommunications and Network Operations
> > _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 14:45:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Nugent <tednugent69 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] How Can I resize the D partition or creat a
	new	one at CCM with OS 2000.4.3
To: Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>, new look
	<newlook110 at yahoo.com>
Cc: cisco voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>, Chris at inxi.com
Message-ID: <804963.64681.qm at web36101.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

When did PM start supporting server OS? I really liked
PM but quite using it a couple years ago strictly for
this reason?

--- Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com> wrote:

> Partition Magic will do it.
> 
> However, OS 4.3 is for a specific model of server. I
> would stick with 4.2
> 
> 
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> On 12/16/06, new look <newlook110 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> > Can I resize the D partition or creat a new one at
> CCM with OS 2000.4.3?
> > Thanks
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:13:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Nugent <tednugent69 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity failover wizard
To: Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <79278.7174.qm at web36115.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

I pray for your sake that they resolved some of the
problems with FO, it's been about a year since I've
had the pleasure of working with it so theres hope I
guess. I've been involved with about 10 different FO
installs and I think it was an even split on customers
that stuck with it and customers that demanded their
money back. I've got some SERIOUS TAC time logged on
Unity FO and still wake up in a cold sweat some nights
dreaming about it. 

I mean give it a shot but if it starts to go south
then jump ship and get yourself a spare drive with a
base Unity install and use DIRT as your DR procedure,
or a full server backup, but the supported backup
solutions tend to be prices with the exchange and SQL
agents that accompany it..
My $0.02

--- Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Ted, We'll keep that in mind. We also found
> that our primary Unity
> server and the new secondary server were put in
> different OU's within AD and
> are getting different policies pushed at them. We
> are on the corporate AD,
> so have to wait till tomorrow to get that fixed. at
> least we have a few
> things to look at now along with the workgroup
> names.
> 
> Doesn't really give me warm and fuzzy feelings about
> unity failover. :)
> 
> Ed
> 
> On 12/17/06, Ted Nugent <tednugent69 at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I know exactly what you're going through! I
> spent
> > days working on this exact problem about a year
> ago
> > and it turned out to be an issue with browser
> service.
> > In our scenario the customer had the CM workgroup
> name
> > "voice" the same as the Unity domain which was
> causing
> > some serious browser election issues! Changing the
> CM
> > workgroup to "CM" resolved the problem for us. The
> > browser election is certainly your problem but
> fixing
> > it can be tricky. I can't remember the exact reg
> > setting but you prevent the servers from
> contributing
> > in the browser election on all your servers and
> force
> > just your DCs to be the only servers that can be
> > elected, they should be by default but I find
> thats
> > not always the case.
> >
> > Also,
> > I hate to say it because I really do like Unity
> but
> > Unity FO is by far the worst product that Cisco
> has to
> > offer. I foresee many hours on the phone with TAC
> in
> > your near future. :-/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone setup Unity failover on version 4.0(4)?
> > >
> > > We are trying to configure failover, the second
> > > server is setup and ready
> > > but when we run the failover wizard we have to
> pick
> > > the failover server out
> > > of a list of servers in the domain but it doesnt
> > > appear in the list. It does
> > > show up in AD users & computers, can ping it,
> etc
> > > etc - but the wizard won't
> > > let me actually type the name of the server in,
> i
> > > have to pick it from the
> > > list where it doesnt appear. Anyone seen this or
> > > have any ideas why it
> > > doesnt show up?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ed Leatherman
> > > Senior Voice Engineer
> > > West Virginia University
> > > Telecommunications and Network Operations
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-voip mailing list
> > > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ed Leatherman
> Senior Voice Engineer
> West Virginia University
> Telecommunications and Network Operations
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 08:01:29 -0600
From: Craig M Staffin <cmstaffin at ra.rockwell.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] H323 and MGCP simultaneously on gateway?
To: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Message-ID:

<OF747AED26.07B94E2F-ON86257248.004CF890-86257248.004CF3D9 at ra.rockwell.c
om>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

We have this working on all of our sites.  Due to the limited nature of 
MGCP we are useing H323 to control all of our connection to the PSTN and

MGCP to control the FXS ports.

Craig

"Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com> 
Sent by: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
12/15/2006 09:41 AM

To
"Wydra, Jason" <jason.wydra at berbee.com>
cc
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject
Re: [cisco-voip] H323 and MGCP simultaneously on gateway?

I have done it.

Configured both and set the H.323 as a second choice on the route list, 
and then killed MGCP, calls still worked fine.

Jonathan

On 12/15/06, Wydra, Jason <jason.wydra at berbee.com> wrote:
Can you? I guess the better question is if it's supported.

Jason Wydra
Berbee
Cisco Voice Engineer
8725 West Higgins Road, Suite 700
Chicago, Il . 60631
IP phone 773.867.6084
Cell 630-209-9792
Jason.Wydra at berbee.com 
www.berbee.com

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061218/9a5922
88/attachment-0001.html 

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:39:28 -0500
From: "Jason Aarons \(US\)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Unity Voicmail Only with Failover (Message Store
	Exchange 2003?)
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:

<C1FE15183DA37645BC0633BC604E44F0041B4E92 at USNAEXCH.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Customer bought new Unity failover bundle voicemail only, they want the
3rd server (Message Store) running Exchange 2003 (versus Exchange 2000)
as part of the existing domain.

Any licensing issues, caveats? They can provide the Exchange 20003
media, it's the licensing I'm wondering about.  Are the Exchange 2000
CALs from Cisco interchangeable with Exchange Server 2003 CALs?

They don't want Exchange 2000 as their email is going from Exchange 5.5
to 2003 and don't want to run AD in mixed mode for Unity.  They want
everything Exchange 2003 Server.

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061218/16aa64
4a/attachment.html 

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 46, Issue 167
*******************************************