[cisco-voip] caller id + DID

Tue Dec 19 08:43:41 EST 2006

Kevin,

does my DN has to be in the same block as the DID i am assigned to by
provider?  ------  this depends on the country and the provider, the problem
you are experiencing looks a lot like that.
In the netherlands for instance it is not allowed to sent out a DN which is
not part of the block out of the E1, the provider will mask it to a "main"
block number, or sends the call with caller-id restricted.(normally a main
block number)

The best way (and mostly the first step) is to call/contact the provider and
figure out what is allowed,preferred, and required for sending/receiving
digits and/or other features.
Otherwise you are troubleshooting with a lot of possibilities, these will
eat up your time and frustrate the hell out of you.

My bet is on the the provider not allowing you to sent out another dn on the
E1/T1

Grtz

Erik Goppel

2006/12/19, kevin k <kds850 at gmail.com>:
>
> i am still working on this caller-id issue.
> to rephrase the situation, i got 3825 router running as gateway with PRI /
> DID from verizon.  it talks mgcp with ccm.  as you see in this email, there
> is that calling number sent via q931.
>
>
> *let me be more realistic, rather than putting all fake number this time.
> i got block of 111-222-4800 thru 4900 thru DID.  my DN is 111-453-2000
> so far the caller id that is received on called party has been
> 111-222-4800 no matter who is calling.
>
> today i ran a few tests.
> device-gateway-caller id dn
> it was blank.  so i put 2224810
> then i got 111-222-4810 as my calling number on the called party.
> i put 453xxxx, because my dn is 4532000, then i get 2224800 on caller id.
> i put 222xxxx, i get 2224800 on caller id.
>
> i got a few suspicion which i like to confirm.
>
> does my DN has to be in the same block as the DID i am assigned to by
> provider?
> i get the call if outsider calls me on my DN.
>
>
>
>
> On 12/18/06, kevin k <kds850 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > here is the debug of q931.
> > my dn is 1112222412 and the number i call is 3012223333, pstn number.
> > the numbers have been changed to protect the id.
> >
> >
> >
> > voip#debug isdn q931
> > voip#
> > Dec 18 13:39:25: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref =
> > 0x0233
> >         Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
> >                 Standard = CCITT
> >                 Transfer Capability = Speech
> >                 Transfer Mode = Circuit
> >                 Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
> >         Channel ID i = 0xA98381
> >                 Exclusive, Channel 1
> >         Calling Party Number i = 0x2181, '1112222412'
> > <--------(((((my dn, voip phone)
> >                 Plan:ISDN, Type:National
> >         Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '3012223333'
> > <-------------((((out side pstn number)
> >                 Plan:ISDN, Type:National
> > Dec 18 13:39:25: ISDN Se0/3/1:23 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref =
> > 0x8233
> >         Channel ID i = 0xA98381
> >                 Exclusive, Channel 1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/13/06, Ted Nugent <tednugent69 at yahoo.com > wrote:
> > >
> > > 95% of the time the problem is with the provider. You
> > > can send them anything that you want in the the
> > > Display IE or FacilityIE but if they don't have your
> > > DID block "masked" (for lack of a better word)
> > > correctly then no CID. You might try getting with them
> > > and see what they're receiving for starters and if
> > > they will pass it along if you provide it "correctly"
> > > or if they need to lock in your corp name for your
> > > entire block. At any rate if they tell you that they
> > > can pass along if you're configured for X then we can
> > > tell you how to configure for X. My experience is that
> > > your DID block will be masked by your provider with
> > > your corp name and that is the best that they can
> > > provide without some sort of act of congress. Also, I
> > > know this might sounds obvious however I've had
> > > customers that were doing this but you can't test this
> > > by calling your mobile phone since most of them will
> > > never show you the name display.
> > > Ted
> > >
> > >
> > > --- kevin k < kds850 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > i have the following config on 3845 with pri
> > > > dial-peer voice 1 pots
> > > >  description outbound to PSTN Local
> > > >  destination-pattern ..........
> > > >  direct-inward-dial
> > > >  port 0/0/0:23
> > > >
> > > > and did of lets say 111-222-3000 thru 111-222-3999
> > > >
> > > > the odd thing is the called id works for incoming
> > > > really well.
> > > > but for the outgoing calls only the "111-222-3000"
> > > > will show up.
> > > >
> > > > anyway to fix it?
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > cisco-voip mailing list
> > > > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ____________________________________________________________________________________
> > > Want to start your own business?
> > > Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
> > > http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
> > >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061219/56575e1b/attachment.html 