[cisco-voip] MGCP vs H323?

[Philip Walenta]

CallerID is not supported on FXO via MGCP.  Essentially the reverse of
Caller name with H.323.  Kinda screwed either way ;-)

  _____  

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 4:22 PM
To: Robert Kulagowski; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MGCP vs H323?


Thanks - those are good to know. However, everything I read said MGCP does
not support callerID on FXO ports.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Robert  <mailto:bob at smalltime.com> Kulagowski 
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MGCP vs H323?

Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> Anyone have any pointers to a Cisco document that explain the difference 
> between MGCP and H323? Namely, what features are available with one or 
> the other?

H.323 supports call preservation going in and out of SRST mode.
H.323 supports digit manipulation on calling / called number for inbound 
and outbound calls.
MGCP has caller name and caller ID delivery to the phone; H.323 will 
only deliver caller ID.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20061223/3ae6fa9a/attachment-0001.html